Limit of (3/4)^(n+1) as n approaches infinity

  • Thread starter Thread starter seal308
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of (3/4)^(n+1) as n approaches infinity is definitively 0. The discussion highlights that as n increases, the denominator (4^(n+1)) grows faster than the numerator (3^(n+1)), leading the entire expression to approach zero. The use of L'Hôpital's rule is unnecessary in this case, as a more straightforward approach involves recognizing that (3/4) is less than 1, which guarantees that the limit converges to zero. The transformation of the expression into e^{(n+1)ln(3/4)} further clarifies this behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with exponential functions
  • Knowledge of L'Hôpital's rule
  • Basic logarithmic properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of limits involving exponential decay
  • Learn about the application of L'Hôpital's rule in different scenarios
  • Explore the concept of convergence in sequences and series
  • Investigate the behavior of functions as they approach infinity
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematicians interested in limits, and educators teaching exponential functions and their properties.

seal308
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was just wondering how to solve this limit: Limit of (3/4)^(n+1) as n approaches infinity

My attempt:
(3/4)^(n+1) = (3^ (n+1) ) / (4 ^ (n+1))
Top goes to infinity and bottom goes to infinity to use l'hopital rule.
lim = ( ln(3) * 1 * 3^(n+1) ) / ( ln(4) * 1 * 4^(n+1) )

But the correct answer is apparently 0.
Not sure if I'm totally wrong or if I'm just halfway there.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
seal308 said:
lim = ( ln(3) * 1 * 3^(n+1) ) / ( ln(4) * 1 * 4^(n+1) )
You are not done here. Both numerator and denominator still go to infinity, and you didn't gain anything.

There are more direct approaches that work.
 
mfb said:
You are not done here. Both numerator and denominator still go to infinity, and you didn't gain anything.

There are more direct approaches that work.
Am I overthinking this.
Is it as simple as the denominator is larger and gets bigger faster and numerator making the whole thing = 0 for that reason?
 
seal308 said:
Am I overthinking this.
Yes.
seal308 said:
Is it as simple as the denominator is larger and gets bigger faster and numerator making the whole thing = 0 for that reason?
Something like that, but the "whole thing" never equals zero. It gets arbitrarily close to zero, though.
 
OK I'll use that logic then. thx
 
If a is any number in the interval (-1, 1), then ##\lim_{n \to \infty}a^n = 0##.

BTW, please don't delete the three parts of the homework template. They are there for a reason; namely, to help you organize your problem and the work you've done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: seal308
I see thanks again.
 
if you write (3/4)^(n+1) as ##e^{(n+1)\ln{(\frac{3}{4})}}## maybe it will be easier to see why it goes to zero since the ln is negative & you don't need l'hopital's rule either.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K