Limit of the solution - Which is the conclusion?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on solving the initial value problem (IVP) given by the differential equation $$y''-(m_1+m_2)y'+m_1m_2y=0$$ with conditions $y(0)=0$ and $y'(0)=1$. The solution for distinct constants $m_1 \neq m_2$ is derived as $$y(x) = \frac{e^{m_2x} - e^{m_1x}}{m_2 - m_1}$$. When $m_1$ approaches $m_2$, the limit of the solution converges to $$y(x) = xe^{m_2x}$$, indicating a transition in the behavior of the solution as the constants converge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order linear differential equations
  • Familiarity with initial value problems (IVPs)
  • Knowledge of the characteristic polynomial and its roots
  • Application of L'Hôpital's Rule for limits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of solutions for second-order linear differential equations
  • Explore the application of L'Hôpital's Rule in calculus
  • Investigate the implications of parameter limits in differential equations
  • Learn about the behavior of solutions near singular points in differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and engineers dealing with differential equations, particularly those focused on initial value problems and their solutions.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

I am looking at the following exercise:

Let $m_1\neq m_2$ be constants and $y$ the solution of the initial value problem $$y''-(m_1+m_2)y'+m_1m_2y=0\ \ \ \ y(0)=0 \ \ y'(0)=1$$
We consider $y$ as a function not only of $x$ but also of $m_1$ and $m_2$.
With constant $m_2$ find (if exists) the limit of $y$ when $m_1\rightarrow m_2$.
What do we conclude? I have done the following:

$$y''-(m_1+m_2)y'+m_1m_2y=0$$
The characteristic polynomial is $$k^2-(m_1+m_2)k+m_1m_2=0$$
We get the following: $$\Delta=m_1^2+2m_1m_2+m_2^2-4m_1m_2=(m_1-m_2)^2$$
Therefore $$k_{1,2}=\frac{m_1+m_2\pm (m_1-m_2)}{2}$$
So, we get $$k_1=\frac{m_1+m_2+m_1-m_2}{2}=m_1, \ \ k_2=\frac{m_1+m_2-m_1+m_2}{2}=m_2$$

The solution of the ivp is $$y(x)=c_1e^{m_1x}+c_2e^{m_2x}$$

$$y(0)=0 \Rightarrow c_1+c_2=0 \Rightarrow c_1=-c_2$$
$$y'(x)=c_1m_1e^{m_1x}+c_2m_2e^{m_2x} \ : \ y'(0)=1 \Rightarrow c_1m_1+m_2c_2=1 \Rightarrow c_1=\frac{1-c_2m_2}{m_1}$$

The solution of the ivp is therefore, $$y(x)=\frac{1-c_2m_2}{m_1}e^{m_1x}+c_2e^{m_2x}$$

We have that \begin{align*}\lim_{m_1\rightarrow m_2}y(x, m_1, m_2)&=\frac{1-c_2m_2}{m_2}e^{m_2x}+\frac{c_2m_2}{m_2}e^{m_2x} \\ & =\frac{1}{m_2}e^{m_2x}-\frac{c_2m_2}{m_2}e^{m_2x}+\frac{c_2m_2}{m_2}e^{m_2x} \\ & = \frac{e^{m_2x}}{m_2}\end{align*}

Is everything correct? (Wondering)

What could we conclude? (Wondering)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey mathmari! (Smile)

mathmari said:
We have that \begin{align*}\lim_{m_1\rightarrow m_2}y(x, m_1, m_2) &= \frac{e^{m_2x}}{m_2}\end{align*}

Is everything correct? (Wondering)

Isn't $y(0) = \frac{e^{m_2x}}{m_2}\Big|_{x=0} = \frac 1{m_2} \ne 0$? (Wondering)

Let's back up a bit:

mathmari said:
The solution of the ivp is $$y(x)=c_1e^{m_1x}+c_2e^{m_2x}$$

$$y(0)=0 \Rightarrow c_1+c_2=0 \Rightarrow c_1=-c_2$$
$$y'(x)=c_1m_1e^{m_1x}+c_2m_2e^{m_2x} \ : \ y'(0)=1 \Rightarrow c_1m_1+m_2c_2=1 \Rightarrow c_1=\frac{1-c_2m_2}{m_1}$$
The solution of the ivp is therefore, $$y(x)=\frac{1-c_2m_2}{m_1}e^{m_1x}+c_2e^{m_2x}$$

We have a system of 2 equations in $c_1$ and $c_2$.
Shouldn't we be able to deduce both of them from that? (Wondering)
 
I tried it again... (Thinking)

The solution of the ivp is $$y(x)=c_1e^{m_1x}+c_2e^{m_2x}$$

$$y(0)=0 \Rightarrow c_1+c_2=0 \Rightarrow c_1=-c_2$$

So, we get $y(x)=-c_2e^{m_1x}+c_2e^{m_2x}$.

The first derivative of $y(x)$ is $y'(x)=-c_2m_1e^{m_1x}+c_2m_2e^{m_2x}$.

From the condition $y'(0)=1$ we get $-c_2m_1+c_2m_2=1 \Rightarrow c_2(m_2-m_1)=1 \Rightarrow c_2=\frac{1}{m_2-m_1}$.

The solution of the ivp is therefore, $$y(x)=-\frac{1}{m_2-m_1}e^{m_1x}+\frac{1}{m_2-m_1}e^{m_2x}=\frac{e^{m_2x}-e^{m_1x}}{m_2-m_1}$$

We have that $$\lim_{m_1\rightarrow m_2}y(x, m_1, m_2)=\lim_{m_1\rightarrow m_2}\frac{e^{m_2x}-e^{m_1x}}{m_2-m_1}=\frac{0}{0}$$

Applying the De L'Hospital Rule we get $$\lim_{m_1\rightarrow m_2}y(x, m_1, m_2)=\lim_{m_1\rightarrow m_2}\frac{-xe^{m_1x}}{-1}=xe^{m_2x}$$ Is everything correct now? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Applying the De L'Hospital Rule we get $$\lim_{m_1\rightarrow m_2}y(x, m_1, m_2)=\lim_{m_1\rightarrow m_2}\frac{-xe^{m_1x}}{-1}=xe^{m_2x}$$

Is everything correct now? (Wondering)

Let's see... (Thinking)

$y(0)=0$ check.

$y'(0)=e^0 + 0 \cdot m_2 \cdot e^0 = 1$ check.

\begin{aligned}y'' - 2m_2 y' + m_2^2 y
&= \d{}x(e^{m_2x} + m_2 x e^{m_2x}) - 2m_2(e^{m_2x} + m_2 x e^{m_2x}) + m_2^2xe^{m_2x} \\
&= m_2e^{m_2x} + m_2 e^{m_2x} + m_2^2xe^{m_2x} - 2m_2(e^{m_2x} + m_2 x e^{m_2x}) + m_2^2xe^{m_2x} \\
&= 0
\end{aligned}
check.

Yep. I believe it is correct. (Nod)

So what is the conclusion?
 
I like Serena said:
Let's see... (Thinking)

$y(0)=0$ check.

$y'(0)=e^0 + 0 \cdot m_2 \cdot e^0 = 1$ check.

\begin{aligned}y'' - 2m_2 y' + m_2^2 y
&= \d{}x(e^{m_2x} + m_2 x e^{m_2x}) - 2m_2(e^{m_2x} + m_2 x e^{m_2x}) + m_2^2xe^{m_2x} \\
&= m_2e^{m_2x} + m_2 e^{m_2x} + m_2^2xe^{m_2x} - 2m_2(e^{m_2x} + m_2 x e^{m_2x}) + m_2^2xe^{m_2x} \\
&= 0
\end{aligned}
check.

Yep. I believe it is correct. (Nod)

(Happy)
I like Serena said:
So what is the conclusion?

When we have the initial value problem $$y''-2my'+m^2y=0\ \ \ \ y(0)=0 \ \ y'(0)=1$$ the solution will be $xe^{mx}$, right? (Wondering) What else could we conclude? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
When we have the initial value problem $$y''-2my'+m^2y=0\ \ \ \ y(0)=0 \ \ y'(0)=1$$ the solution will be $xe^{mx}$, right? (Wondering)

What else could we conclude? (Wondering)

When we have the ivp $y''-(m_1+m_2)y'+m_1m_2y=0,\ \ \ \ y(0)=0, \ \ y'(0)=1$, the solution for $m_1\ne m_2$ is:
$$y(x) = \frac{e^{m_2x} - e^{m_1x}}{m_2 - m_1}$$
This solution does not exist if $m_1=m_2$.
In that case the solution is:
$$y(x) = xe^{m_2x}$$
which we could find by taking the limit. (Nerd)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
754
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K