MHB Limits of x* when n and m Approach Infinity

ozkan12
Messages
145
Reaction score
0
if $\lim_{{n}\to{\infty}} {y}_{m+1}={x}^{*}$, Can we say that $\lim_{{n}\to{\infty}} {y}_{n-1}={x}^{*}$...Please pay attention, I say m and n...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ozkan12 said:
if $\lim_{{n}\to{\infty}} {y}_{m+1}={x}^{*}$, Can we say that $\lim_{{n}\to{\infty}} {y}_{n-1}={x}^{*}$...Please pay attention, I say m and n...

Did you mean to write

If
$$\lim_{m\to\infty}y_{m+1}=x^*,$$
can we say that
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}y_{n-1}=x^*?$$

Because, if so, the answer is yes, if $n$ and $m$ are just independent integers going to infinity. The variable used in the limit is just like a "dummy variable". You can also show that if $n$ is an arbitrary integer, and
$$\lim_{n\to\infty}y_n=x^*,$$
then any subsequence must also converge:
$$\lim_{m\to\infty}y_{n_m}=x^*.$$
 
Dear Ackbach

How if $\lim_{{m}\to{\infty}} {y}_{m+1}={x}^{*}$ we can say that $\lim_{{n}\to{\infty}} {y}_{n}={x}^{*}$ ? I didnt understand...Please can you explain...Thank you for your attention
 
Last edited:
I posted this question on math-stackexchange but apparently I asked something stupid and I was downvoted. I still don't have an answer to my question so I hope someone in here can help me or at least explain me why I am asking something stupid. I started studying Complex Analysis and came upon the following theorem which is a direct consequence of the Cauchy-Goursat theorem: Let ##f:D\to\mathbb{C}## be an anlytic function over a simply connected region ##D##. If ##a## and ##z## are part of...