What is the work done in moving a particle around a closed curve?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The work done in moving a particle around a closed curve defined by the vector field \bold{F} = (y+z) \bold{i} - (x+z) \bold{j} + (x+y) \bold{k} is calculated to be 2π. The particle moves from the origin to (0,0,2π) along the parametric equations x=1-cos t, y=sin t, z=t, and returns along the z-axis. Two methods of integration were attempted, with the first yielding an incorrect result of 0 due to misinterpretation of static functions, while the second method showed the correct work done as 2π after resolving integration by parts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Vector calculus, specifically line integrals
  • Understanding of parametric equations
  • Integration techniques, including integration by parts
  • Familiarity with vector fields and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study line integrals in vector calculus
  • Learn about parametric curves and their applications
  • Review integration by parts with examples
  • Explore the properties of conservative vector fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics and mathematics, particularly those studying vector calculus and mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of work done in vector fields.

bigevil
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For the field \bold{F} = (y+z) \bold{i} - (x+z) \bold{j} + (x+y) \bold{k} find the work done in moving a particle around the following closed curve:

from the origin to (0,0,2π) on the curve x=1-cos t, y=sin t, z=t; and back to the origin along the z-axis. The answer is 2π. (This question is from Mary L Boas' textbook btw, which is why I have the answer.)

Homework Equations



We get:
dx = sin t dt
dy = cos t dt
dz = dt

x = 1 - cos t
y = sin t
z = t

I did this two ways and didn't get either right. Could someone point out what was wrong with both methods and give me a hint?

First method: I assumed that dx = dy = 0. This gives \int_0^{2\pi} (1-cos t + sin t) dt = 2\pi. But going by this method, going back to origin means that the integral for the reverse action is -2π, so the work is 0. This method is probably wrong because, obviously, x=1 - cos t is not a "static" function.

Second method: Expand everything in full, which means

W = \int F . dr = \int (sin t + t)(sin t) dt - (1 - cos t + t)(cos t) dt + (1 - cos t + sin t) dt = \int_0^{2\pi} 2 + sin t - 2 cos t dt = 4\pi, which is also wrong. For the reverse action, the limits are flipped and I get 0 again.

I think this is the right method, but there's something wrong with the integration here although its supposed to be pretty simple.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi bigevil! :smile:
bigevil said:
dx = sin t dt
dy = cos t dt
dz = dt

W = \int F . dr = \int (sin t + t)(sin t) dt - (1 - cos t + t)(cos t) dt + (1 - cos t + sin t) dt = \int_0^{2\pi} 2 + sin t - 2 cos t dt

what happened to tsint and tcost?

also, dr2 = … ? :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi bigevil! :smile:what happened to tsint and tcost?

also, dr2 = … ? :smile:

Hi Tim, what do you mean dr^2? There shouldn't be a square in the line integral (F.dr) right?

I think I saw where I got it wrong... I did integration by parts for t cos t and got 0 (between 2π and 0)... then I removed the t cos t / t sin t from the expression. But the integration by parts for t sin t is 2π.

So, 4π - 2π = 2π, but I have another problem, that integral was just one direction. In the other direction the integral is -2π, so the ans. is 0!
 
bigevil said:
Hi Tim, what do you mean dr^2? There shouldn't be a square in the line integral (F.dr) right?

You need to know what dr is in terms of t …

I only asked about dr squared because it's easier to calculate! :smile:
So, 4π - 2π = 2π, but I have another problem, that integral was just one direction. In the other direction the integral is -2π, so the ans. is 0!

What do you mean, "the other direction"? :confused:

That's the negative z-direction, and F.k = x + y.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K