Linear algebra and abstract algebra simultaneously?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the feasibility of taking an abstract algebra course without prior completion of linear algebra, especially for a sophomore interested in pursuing a major in pure mathematics and graduate studies. The individual expresses a desire to engage in advanced courses and research early in their academic career, despite scheduling conflicts that prevented them from taking linear algebra earlier. Participants highlight the importance of university guidelines regarding course prerequisites and co-requisites, emphasizing that the rigor and expectations of specific courses can vary significantly between institutions. They caution against relying solely on online opinions and stress the need to consult academic advisors or course syllabi to determine if concurrent enrollment in both courses is manageable.
interloper
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Is this a good idea (provided the university will allow it)? I'll be going into my sophomore year at my university. But I'm unfamiliar with exactly how much linear algebra an intro course in abstract algebra would require. In hindsight I probably should have taken linear last semester, but scheduling issues meant that I would have had to sacrifice a lot to do it. I'm interested in doing a major in pure math and maybe going to grad school, and thus I want to get involved with research as early as possible. For this reason I want to start taking advanced courses soon, and abstract felt like a good place to start.

There are other math courses I could take instead, but most of them seem to require linear algebra, and the ones that don't either interfere with my schedule or are only offered spring semester. Since abstract algebra seems to build from fundamentals, it felt like a good option. Thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um...why are you asking us?

I think you hit a key point with "provided the university will allow it". Why would you take the recommendations of a bunch of folks on the internet over those of the university?

Courses in Linear vary from "a bag of computational tricks" all the way to "abstract lite". We can't tell how much rigor your particular university's version has, and we can't tell how much prior knowledge the abstract professor expects the students to walk in with. That's what prereqs and co-reqs are for. Taking them concurrently might work out, or you might get squashed like a bug.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K