Linear Functionals: Why Not ##I(u) = \int_a^b u\frac{du}{dx}dx##?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
9 replies · 2K views
bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Why does this not qualify as a linear functional based on the relation ##l(\alpha u+\beta v)=\alpha l(u)+\beta l(v)##?

##\displaystyle I(u)=\int_a^b u \frac{du}{dx} dx##

Homework Equations


where ##\alpha## and ##\beta## are real numbers and ##u## , ##v## are dependent variables.

The Attempt at a Solution


If we let ##\displaystyle I(v)=\int_a^b v \frac{dv}{dx} dx##

then ##l(\alpha u+\beta v)=##

##\displaystyle \int_a^b ( \alpha u \frac{du}{dx} dx + \beta v \frac{dv}{dx} dx)=\displaystyle \int_a^b \alpha u \frac{du}{dx} dx +\int_a^b \beta v \frac{dv}{dx} dx=\displaystyle \alpha\int_a^b u \frac{du}{dx} dx +\beta \int_a^b v \frac{dv}{dx} dx=\alpha l(u)+\beta l(v)##...? THanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]I(\alpha u) = \int_a^b \alpha u \frac{d (\alpha u)}{d x} dx[/tex]
 
Very cursorily, it is not "linear" because it is a product of two terms involving u.

Your formula for [itex]l(\alpha u+ \beta v)[/itex] is incorrect. You are doing as if [itex](a+ b)^2[/itex] were equal to [itex]a^2+ b^2[/itex] and that is not true.

You need
[tex]l(\alpha u+ \beta v)= \int_a^b (\alpha u+ \beta v)\frac{d(\alpha u+ \beta v)}{dx}dx[/tex]

[tex]= \int_a^b (\alpha u+ \beta v)(\alpha\frac{du}{dx}+ \beta\frac{dv}{dx})dx[/tex]
[tex]= \alpha^2 \int_a^b u\frac{du}{dx}dx+ \alpha\beta\int_a^b u\frac{dv}{dx}dx+ \alpha\beta\int_a^b v\frac{du}{dx}dx+ \beta^2\int_a^bv\frac{dv}{dx}dx[/tex]
 
The_Duck said:
[tex]I(\alpha u) = \int_a^b \alpha u \frac{d (\alpha u)}{d x} dx[/tex]

HallsofIvy said:
Very cursorily, it is not "linear" because it is a product of two terms involving u.

This is what I thought so too and that this non linearity has nothing to do with the realtion in my first thread...however

HallsofIvy said:
Your formula for [itex]l(\alpha u+ \beta v)[/itex] is incorrect. You are doing as if [itex](a+ b)^2[/itex] were equal to [itex]a^2+ b^2[/itex] and that is not true.

You need
[tex]l(\alpha u+ \beta v)= \int_a^b (\alpha u+ \beta v)\frac{d(\alpha u+ \beta v)}{dx}dx[/tex]

[tex]= \int_a^b (\alpha u+ \beta v)(\alpha\frac{du}{dx}+ \beta\frac{dv}{dx})dx[/tex]
[tex]= \alpha^2 \int_a^b u\frac{du}{dx}dx+ \alpha\beta\int_a^b u\frac{dv}{dx}dx+ \alpha\beta\int_a^b v\frac{du}{dx}dx+ \beta^2\int_a^bv\frac{dv}{dx}dx[/tex]

...in the book (which I am self studying finite element theory) it states

" a functional ##l(u)## is said to be linear in u iff it satisfies the relation..."

##l(\alpha u+\beta v)= \alpha l(u)+\beta l(v)##...? How is this wrong?
 
bugatti79 said:
This is what I thought so too and that this non linearity has nothing to do with the realtion in my first thread...however



...in the book (which I am self studying finite element theory) it states

" a functional ##l(u)## is said to be linear in u iff it satisfies the relation..."

##l(\alpha u+\beta v)= \alpha l(u)+\beta l(v)##...? How is this wrong?

HallsofIvy said:
Well, as I showed in my first response, it is NOT [itex]\alpha l(u)+ \beta l(v)[/itex],
it is [itex]\alpha^2l(u)+ \beta^2l(v)[/itex] plus two additional terms!

Ok, what about this one. Using the same relation ##l(αu+βv)=αl(u)+βl(v)## for a functional ##l(u)=\displaystyle \int_a^b f(x) u dx +c##? The book states this is not a linear functional...? Why? Heres my attempt..

let ##l(v)=\displaystyle \int_a^b g(x) v dx +d## then the LHS of the relation can be written as

##\displaystyle \int_a^b \alpha f(x) u dx +\alpha c + \displaystyle \int_a^b \beta g(x) v dx +\beta d=\alpha (\int_a^b f(x) u dx +c) + \beta (\displaystyle \int_a^b g(x) v dx +d)=αl(u)+βl(v)##...Why is this not a linear functional?
 
Nonononononono!

First of all [itex]l(v)=\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx+c[/itex], NOT [itex]l(v)=\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b g(x)vdx+d[/itex]. Who give you rights to say [itex]g(x)[/itex] or [itex]d[/itex]? NOBODY!
[itex]l(\alpha u + \beta v) = \displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)(\alpha u + \beta v)dx + c[/itex], not [itex]+\alpha c + \beta c[/itex]
 
Karamata said:
Nonononononono!

First of all [itex]l(v)=\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx+c[/itex], NOT [itex]l(v)=\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b g(x)vdx+d[/itex]. Who give you rights to say [itex]g(x)[/itex] or [itex]d[/itex]? NOBODY!
[itex]l(\alpha u + \beta v) = \displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)(\alpha u + \beta v)dx + c[/itex], not [itex]+\alpha c + \beta c[/itex]

ok...the the RHS would end up like
## \displaystyle \alpha \int\limits_a^b f(x)u dx + \beta \int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx + c=\alpha l(u)+\beta l(v)+c##

What about the c though, that's not in the relation?
 
bugatti79 said:
ok...the the RHS would end up like
## \displaystyle \alpha \int\limits_a^b f(x)u dx + \beta \int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx + c=\alpha l(u)+\beta l(v)+c##

What about the c though, that's not in the relation?

This isn't good, because

[itex]\alpha l(u) + \beta l(v)+c = \alpha \left(\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)udx+c\right)+\beta \left(\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx+c\right)+c = \alpha\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)udx + \alpha c + \beta \displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx + \beta c + c \neq \displaystyle \alpha \int\limits_a^b f(x)u dx + \beta \int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx + c[/itex]
 
Karamata said:
This isn't good, because

[itex]\alpha l(u) + \beta l(v)+c = \alpha \left(\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)udx+c\right)+\beta \left(\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx+c\right)+c = \alpha\displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)udx + \alpha c + \beta \displaystyle\int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx + \beta c + c \neq \displaystyle \alpha \int\limits_a^b f(x)u dx + \beta \int\limits_a^b f(x)vdx + c[/itex]

So it cannot be a linear functional then...right? Looks good.THanks!