Linear Map, T^p(x)=0, Show Linear Independence

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
joypav
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
Problem:

Suppose V is a complex vector space of dimension n, and T is a linear map from V to V. Suppose $x \in V$, and p is a positive integer such that $T^p(x)=0$ but $T^{p-1}(x)\ne0$.

Show that $x, Tx, T^2x, ... , T^{p-1}x$ are linearly independent.During class my professor said it was "a fact" that

If V is a complex vector space of dimension n, and T is a linear map from V to V such that $T^n(x)=0$ but $T^{n-1}(x)\ne0$,
then there exists an x such that $x, Tx, T^2x, ... , T^{n-1}x$ are linearly independent.

Is this what I should use for this problem? If so, do I need to know how I can determine such an x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you assert your professor said and the theorem you state are not quite the same. You say your professor said "If V is a complex vector space of dimension n, and T is a linear map from V to V such that [tex]T^n(x)= 0[/tex] but [tex]T^{n-1}(x)[/tex] is not 0" then there exist x such that ...". If the conclusion is "there exist x" then what is that x in the hypothesis?

In any case, given that, for some linear transformation there exist vector x and integer n such that [tex]T^n(x)= 0[/tex] but that [tex]T^{n-1}(x)\ne 0[/tex] (from which it follows that [tex]T^m(x)\ne 0[/tex] for any m< n), the suppose to the contrary that x, T(x), [tex]T^2(x)[/tex], ..., [tex]T^{n-1}(x)[/tex] are NOT linearly independent. Then there exist [tex]\{a_n\}[/tex], not all 0, such that [tex]a_0x+ a_1T(x)+\cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{n-2}T^{n-2}(x)+ a_{n-}T^{n-1}(x)= 0[/tex]. Apply T to both sides: [tex]a_0T(x)+ a_1T^2(x)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{n-1}T^{n-1}(x)+ a_nT^n(x)= a_0T(x)+ a_1T^2(x)+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_{n-1}T^{n-1}(x)= 0[/tex].

Applying T n-1 times, and repeatedly using the fact that [tex]T^n(x)= 0[/tex], we arrive at [tex]a_0T^{n-1}(x)= 0[/tex]. If [tex]a_0\ne 0[/tex] it follows that [tex]T^{n-1}(x)= 0[/tex], a contradiction. If [tex]a_0= 0[/tex], we only need to apply T n-2 times to arrive at [tex]a_1T^{n-1}(x)= 0[/tex], etc.