Linear operators and a change of basis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the operator Omega defined as (i*h-bar)/sqrt(2)[ |2><1| + |3><2| - |1><2| - |2><3| ]. It is concluded that Omega is non-Hermitian due to the asymmetry in its matrix representation. The matrix representation of Omega in the basis {|1>, |2>, |3>} is confirmed to be a 3x3 matrix with specific entries. The discussion also addresses the construction of a new operator U in a transformed basis and raises questions about its unitary nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with matrix representations of linear operators
  • Knowledge of basis transformations in quantum mechanics
  • Proficiency in manipulating kets and bras notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian and non-Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn how to construct matrix representations of operators in different bases
  • Explore the concept of unitary operators and their significance in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the implications of basis transformations on operator representations
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists working with linear operators, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

wakko101
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
So...I've got an operator.

Omega = (i*h-bar)/sqrt(2)[ |2><1| + |3><2| - |1><2| - |2><3| ]

Part a asks if this is Hermitian, and my answer, unless I'm missing something, is no. Because the second part in square brackets is |1><2| + |2><3| - |2><1| - |2><3| which is not the same as Omega.

The second part asks to construct the matrix Omega(ij) = <i|Omega|j> that represents this operator in the basis {|1>, |2>, |3>}. I figured it out to be
0 1 0
1 0 1 all multiplied by that funky complex factor at the beginning.
0 1 0

Or so I think.

The third part is where it gets tricky. It gives a new basis {|1'>, |2'>, |3'>} that's somewhat complicated looking and written in terms of the original basis vectors. It asks to write out the operator

U = (from i=1 to 3) SUM(|i'><i|)

in terms of the kets {|1>, |2>, |3>} and bras {<1|, <2|, <3|}. And it asks if the operator is unitary. My problem is this...how do I go about writing out this operator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your reason for it being non-Hermitian makes sense. The part in brackets can't be the same as Omega because there's a factor out the front, could you clarify what you meant? I would say that Omega is not because <2|O(1)> does not equal <O(2)|1>.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K