Linear Programming Constraints

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on minimizing a function over a complex surface using linear programming, specifically addressing the challenge of setting up constraints. The surface is parameterized as H(ξ) = X_f(ξ) - X_d, where X_f and X_d are matrices, complicating the gradient calculation. The user is uncertain whether to vectorize the derivative ∂H/∂ξ_j or break it into real and imaginary parts for proper handling. The importance of the surface's structure is highlighted, as it may contain valuable information for the optimization process. The thread seeks guidance on effectively managing these constraints in the context of the optimization problem.
Kreizhn
Messages
714
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to minimize a function over a rather complicated surface. I'm using an algorithm that takes an initial guess, finds the tangent plane at that point, minimizes using a linear programming algorithm, then (tries to) project back onto the complicated surface.

More specifically, if \xi is a vector and H(\xi) is the surface, I want to solve the linear programming problem
\min c^T \xi, \quad \text{subject to } \nabla H(\xi) (\xi - \bar \xi) = 0
Now my problem is that I'm having trouble setting up the constraints. This wouldn't normally be difficult, except that my surface is parameterized as
H(\xi) = X_f(\xi) - X_d
where X_f, X_d are matrices.

Normally in these cases H(\xi) is at worst vector-valued and so \frac{\partial H}{\partial \xi_j} is a vector so that \nabla H(\xi) is a matrix. However in this case \frac{\partial H}{\partial \xi_j} is itself a matrix.

How do I handle this? Do I ``vectorize'' \frac{\partial H}{\partial \xi_j}? Do I break it into real and imaginary parts then vectorize? I'm not sure how to handle this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If your surface consists of vectors or points shouldn't play a role. In the context they are points, however they look like. The condition is meant to constrain the set of all points, regardless its structure. The structure might play a role in the optimization process as it contains additional information which might be useful, e.g. the shape of the boundaries where the optimal solution is likely to be found.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K