Linear Programming Involving Indices

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on optimizing a marketing budget of $30,000 for advertising through internet and posters, constrained by specific budgetary limits and an index measuring customer contact. The constraints include that spending on internet ads cannot exceed double that of posters, and at least $7,500 must be allocated to each method. The objective function to maximize customer contact is defined as z = 60x + 90y, where x is the amount spent on internet ads and y is the amount spent on posters. The indices for customer contact per dollar spent are 60 for internet ads and 90 for posters.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear programming concepts
  • Familiarity with budget allocation strategies
  • Knowledge of objective functions and constraints
  • Basic grasp of indices and their application in marketing
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about formulating linear programming problems using constraints and objective functions
  • Study graphical methods for solving linear programming problems
  • Explore the implications of budget allocation on marketing effectiveness
  • Investigate the use of indices in measuring advertising performance
USEFUL FOR

Marketing professionals, data analysts, and students studying optimization techniques in advertising budgets will benefit from this discussion.

I Like Pi
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A marketing team is given a budget of 30,000 to advertise a new show. It wants to promote this show using two methods, internet and posters. The executives have decided that the overall budget used on the internet can't be greater than double the budget used on posters. Furthermore, at the least, a quarter of the total budget must be used on each method. The marketing team uses an index that measures customer contact for every dollar spent on the ad. The index may range from 0 to 100 (bigger meaning more customer contact). The internet has an index of 60 and the posters have an index of 90.

How should the marketing team organize it's budget to maximize contact?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let's statement:
let x = $ spent on internet ad
let y = $ spent on poster ad

Constraints:
x≤2y
x+y≤30,000
x,y≥7,500

Objective:
This is where I am having a tremendously hard time. I know that we want to max customer contact. So let Cmax be the objective function. What i am unsure of is whether Cmax is an index, or the actual number of contacts, or a dollar value? I believe it should be a dollar value because the problem deals with monetary units. So Cmax = I + P, where I is the internet portion of the contact and P is the poster portion. Now, Cmax = ix + py, where i is internet portion and p is poster portion. Now I am unsure of what i and p are... I can't let i and p be the indices given... So do i have to convert the indices? And how would i go about doing so?

Thanks in advance,
I Like Pi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I Like Pi said:

Homework Statement



A marketing team is given a budget of 30,000 to advertise a new show. It wants to promote this show using two methods, internet and posters. The executives have decided that the overall budget used on the internet can't be greater than double the budget used on posters. Furthermore, at the least, a quarter of the total budget must be used on each method. The marketing team uses an index that measures customer contact for every dollar spent on the ad. The index may range from 0 to 100 (bigger meaning more customer contact). The internet has an index of 60 and the posters have an index of 90.

How should the marketing team organize it's budget to maximize contact?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Let's statement:
let x = $ spent on internet ad
let y = $ spent on poster ad

Constraints:
x≤2y
x+y≤30,000
x,y≥7,500

Objective:
This is where I am having a tremendously hard time. I know that we want to max customer contact. So let Cmax be the objective function. What i am unsure of is whether Cmax is an index, or the actual number of contacts, or a dollar value? I believe it should be a dollar value because the problem deals with monetary units. So Cmax = I + P, where I is the internet portion of the contact and P is the poster portion. Now, Cmax = ix + py, where i is internet portion and p is poster portion. Now I am unsure of what i and p are... I can't let i and p be the indices given... So do i have to convert the indices? And how would i go about doing so?

Thanks in advance,
I Like Pi


The formulation so far is OK.

About the objective: what would be the measure of customer contact if $1 is spent on internet ads? What is the contact measure if $x is spent on internet ads?

Note: this is some type of "measurement" of customer contact, not necessarily an actual number of customers contacted. Presumably the company's marketing research department devised these scales, or hired a consultant to do it for them. The only thing that matters is that the company wants to use it.

RGV
 
Ray Vickson said:
About the objective: what would be the measure of customer contact if $1 is spent on internet ads? What is the contact measure if $x is spent on internet ads?
RGV

That is the part I am unsure of... I don't know what the measure of customer contact for $1 would be... I was thinking of relating the 0-100 to the price constraints? :confused:
 
I Like Pi said:
A marketing team is given a budget of 30,000 to advertise a new show. It wants to promote this show using two methods, internet and posters. The executives have decided that the overall budget used on the internet can't be greater than double the budget used on posters. Furthermore, at the least, a quarter of the total budget must be used on each method. The marketing team uses an index that measures customer contact for every dollar spent on the ad. The index may range from 0 to 100 (bigger meaning more customer contact). The internet has an index of 60 and the posters have an index of 90.

How should the marketing team organize it's budget to maximize contact?


Objective:
This is where I am having a tremendously hard time. I know that we want to max customer contact. So let Cmax be the objective function. What i am unsure of is whether Cmax is an index, or the actual number of contacts, or a dollar value? I believe it should be a dollar value because the problem deals with monetary units. So Cmax = I + P, where I is the internet portion of the contact and P is the poster portion. Now, Cmax = ix + py, where i is internet portion and p is poster portion. Now I am unsure of what i and p are... I can't let i and p be the indices given... So do i have to convert the indices? And how would i go about doing so?
These types of problems typically use z for the variable that is maximized or minimized, although Cmax is OK, too.

It seems clear to me that z (or Cmax) is an index (or measure) of customer contact. For this problem it will come out somewhere between 60 (internet ads only) and 90 (posters only). If there were no constraints, the maximum customer contact would be attained by using posters only.
 
I Like Pi said:
That is the part I am unsure of... I don't know what the measure of customer contact for $1 would be... I was thinking of relating the 0-100 to the price constraints? :confused:

Did you read the question? In part it said "The marketing team uses an index that measures customer contact for every dollar spent on the ad."

RGV
 
Mark44 said:
These types of problems typically use z for the variable that is maximized or minimized, although Cmax is OK, too.

It seems clear to me that z (or Cmax) is an index (or measure) of customer contact. For this problem it will come out somewhere between 60 (internet ads only) and 90 (posters only). If there were no constraints, the maximum customer contact would be attained by using posters only.

Okay, so Cmax (or z) is the index...

Ray Vickson said:
Did you read the question? In part it said "The marketing team uses an index that measures customer contact for every dollar spent on the ad."

RGV

I still don't understand...so for every dollar spent, the index for internet is 60 and so on. What if i did this: Cmax = (60x+90y)/30 000?
That's all I can figure out...
I Like Pi
 
Last edited:
The objective function is:
z = 60x + 90y

subject to the various constraints on total spent, relative amounts for internet and posters, and so on.
Your goal is to maximize the objective function.

Since there are only two variables, a graph of the feasible region would be one approach. (As opposed to setting up the equations and inequalities in a tableau.)
 
Mark44 said:
The objective function is:
z = 60x + 90y

I had this initially, but I don't see how it makes sense... shouldn't your z be in the 0-100 range? And what unit do you get when you multiply the index by the budget?

I Like Pi
 
No, z is not in the range 0 through 100. The index is a per-dollar measure of customer contact - the more dollars, the more contact.
 
  • #10
Mark44 said:
No, z is not in the range 0 through 100. The index is a per-dollar measure of customer contact - the more dollars, the more contact.

So z doesn't matter? I am still having a hard time understanding the logic behind that equation... what does it mean when the index is multiplied by the dollar value? Wouldn't the units of z be in dollars?

I Like Pi
 
  • #11
I Like Pi said:
So z doesn't matter? I am still having a hard time understanding the logic behind that equation... what does it mean when the index is multiplied by the dollar value? Wouldn't the units of z be in dollars?

I Like Pi

For internet ads the measure of exposure is 60 per $ spent. So, if they spend $1 they get exposure 60. If they spend $1,000,000 they get exposure 60,000,000. Obviously, the TOTAL exposure cannot just range from 1 to 100, since they need to know if the exposure is 60 or 6,000 or 60,000 or what; if they just divide by something to put all such figures in the range 0-100, they will have no way to tell the difference. You are just over-thinking the problem!

RGV
 
  • #12
Ray Vickson said:
For internet ads the measure of exposure is 60 per $ spent. So, if they spend $1 they get exposure 60. If they spend $1,000,000 they get exposure 60,000,000. Obviously, the TOTAL exposure cannot just range from 1 to 100, since they need to know if the exposure is 60 or 6,000 or 60,000 or what; if they just divide by something to put all such figures in the range 0-100, they will have no way to tell the difference. You are just over-thinking the problem!

RGV

I see what what you're getting at... so 60x would then be rationalized again to be in the 0 to 100 range (to be an index)?

I Like Pi
 
  • #13
I Like Pi said:
I see what what you're getting at... so 60x would then be rationalized again to be in the 0 to 100 range (to be an index)?

I Like Pi

Sigh! I said the exact opposite. At his point I give up.

RGV
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K