Linear regression and measured values

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on using linear regression to identify the coefficients A, B, and C of a synchronous generator model defined by the equation I(w, T) = A*T + B*w + C. The user expresses concern about obtaining multiple solutions with similar error estimates, which may not accurately reflect measurement errors. The conversation highlights the importance of fixing variables during testing to reduce uncertainty in coefficient estimation, particularly for B, while acknowledging that measurement errors can impact the accuracy of the model. Recommendations include understanding the limitations of linear regression in the context of measurement errors and exploring literature on statistical methods for better model accuracy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Linear regression fundamentals
  • Understanding of synchronous generators
  • Statistical analysis of measurement errors
  • Partial derivatives in multivariable functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study linear regression techniques in Python using libraries like scikit-learn
  • Explore the impact of measurement errors on statistical models
  • Learn about multivariable calculus, specifically partial derivatives
  • Research literature on model validation and error estimation in engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, data scientists, and researchers involved in modeling physical systems, particularly those working with synchronous generators and linear regression analysis.

MechatronO
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
So I'm trying to identify a system that happens to be a synchronus generator via linear regression. I've got a model with the unknown coefficients A, B and C, and the measured variables I, w and T according to

I(w, T) = A*T + B*w + C

1. What I fear is that I could get multiple solutions that all are very similar in their error estimates. But, due to measurement errors, the one that shows the smallest error isn't the most accurate estimation in reality. Am I thinking correctly here?

2. I do have the possibility to run a number of tests with a fixed T, only varing W. Thus I can create a an approximate partial derivate of the function so

∂ I/∂w = B

Then I can have the value for B fixed, when searching for the values for A and C in a mesurement series with a varying T. Would this statistically decrease the risk for what is describe in (1)? I cannot get A with the same method, as I can't lock the value for w.

Any litterature and theory tips would be great so that I can learn more.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the one that shows the smallest error isn't the most accurate estimation in reality
That is unavoidable when there are unknown errors. Linear regression that fits well is probably as good as you can do unless you have better knowledge about the physics of the generator or the measurement errors. If you fix both T and W for several tests, you can get an idea of the magnitude of the measurement errors. That will tell you the most you can expect from even the best model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K