Little question about string theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the mathematical representation of string theory, specifically the spatial configuration of closed strings and their wave function mappings. The particle's spatial configuration is defined using the function f:S^1→ℝ³, which adheres to the integral condition du;|∇f(u)| = L. The conversation explores the potential of describing strings with wave mappings Ψ:{f}→ℂ and compares this approach to quantum field theory (QFT), noting the preference for operator-based representations in both fields. The participant also mentions plans to study QFT and string theory in upcoming courses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and wave functions
  • Familiarity with string theory concepts, particularly closed strings
  • Knowledge of mathematical analysis, specifically integrals and gradients
  • Basic principles of quantum field theory (QFT)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of string theory, focusing on closed strings
  • Explore the role of wave functionals in quantum field theory
  • Study operator methods in quantum mechanics and their applications in string theory
  • Investigate the implications of wave mappings in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of string theory and quantum field theory.

jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
If a particle is point like, then point [itex]x\in\mathbb{R}^3[/itex] specifies the particle's spatial configuration, and the quantum mechanical wave function for the particle is

[tex] \Psi:\mathbb{R}^3\to\mathbb{C}[/tex]

The spatial configuration of a closed string with fixed length L can be specified with a function

[tex] f:S^1\to\mathbb{R}^3[/tex]

such that the function satisfies

[tex] \underset{S^1}{\int} du\;|\nabla f(u)| = L[/tex]

Is the idea in string theory to then describe these strings with wave mappings

[tex] \Psi:\{f\}\to\mathbb{C}?[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If this had been normal string theory, somebody would have probably already confirmed it.

Is the situation with this little like with the QFT? It is possible to describe the states of quantum fields with wave functionals, but it is not popular, and everybody wants to do everything with the operators more abstractly without explicit representations.

In string theory everything is done again with operators, although the wave mapping approach could possible work too?

(btw. If everything goes as planned (course on QFT this fall successfully), I'll be taking my first course on string theory on the spring. I'm just warming up here.)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
10K