Ln(t) - t = 2; Solve for 't'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltapapazulu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The equation ln(t) - t = 2 cannot be solved for 't' using elementary functions, as it is a transcendental equation. A graphical approach or numerical methods, such as the Newton-Raphson method, can be employed to approximate solutions. The equation can be transformed into the form suitable for the Lambert-W function, leading to the solution t = -ProductLog[-e^2]. The numerical solution yields t = -1.13902 - 2.07318i, indicating a complex component.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transcendental equations
  • Familiarity with logarithmic functions
  • Knowledge of the Lambert-W function
  • Basic skills in numerical methods and iterative solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Newton-Raphson method for solving equations
  • Learn about the Lambert-W function and its applications
  • Explore numerical methods for solving transcendental equations
  • Experiment with Excel for graphical solutions to equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying advanced calculus, and anyone interested in solving transcendental equations using numerical methods and special functions.

deltapapazulu
Messages
84
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Is there a simple way to solve for 't' in the equation: ln(t) - t = 2 ? Just a curiosity. Not for a class. I've browsed to texts that cover logarithmic equations and haven't found a single problem or rule say how to solve for 't'.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no way to get 't' in terms of elementary functions, but you can solve it graphically or perhaps using another complex function.
 
Trancendental equation.
No closed form solution.
Turn it into a game.
Calculate ln(t)-t vs t in Excel.
Play with t.
Stop when you get to an answer accurate to 6 decimal places, ie. 2.000001.
Now you will have developed some feel for the iterative solution of a trancendental equation. You can then read more about Newton-Raphson, etc.
 
Exponentiate both sides to get:

te^{-t} = e^2

Now, multiply both sides by -1 to get -te^{-t} = -e^2. This is now of the form of the Lambert-W function, defined by

W(z)e^{W(z)} = z,

which determines t in terms of the lambert W function. This function is not an elementary function, but much is known about it. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W .
 

Mathematica 6 found a solution, however the numerical solution has a imaginary axis component.

ln(t) - t = 2

t = - ProductLog[-e^2]

ProductLog[z]
gives the principal solution for w in z=we^w.

The ProductLog[z] function is the Lambert-W function, however Mathematica 6 and 7 documentation does not mention this.

t = -1.13902 - 2.07318i
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W"
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/ProductLog.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K