Ln(t) - t = 2; Solve for 't'?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltapapazulu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation ln(t) - t = 2 for the variable 't'. Participants explore the nature of the equation, identifying it as a transcendental equation, and express curiosity about potential methods for finding solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Some participants note that there is no elementary function solution for 't' and suggest graphical or numerical methods instead. Others mention the use of the Lambert-W function as a way to express 't' in terms of this non-elementary function. There are also discussions about using software tools like Excel and Mathematica for numerical approximations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored, including graphical methods and the Lambert-W function. Participants have shared insights into numerical solutions and the limitations of closed-form expressions, but no consensus has been reached on a singular method.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the premise that the problem is not for a class assignment, which may influence the depth of exploration and the types of solutions considered. There is also mention of an imaginary component in one of the numerical solutions, indicating complexity in the problem's nature.

deltapapazulu
Messages
84
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



Is there a simple way to solve for 't' in the equation: ln(t) - t = 2 ? Just a curiosity. Not for a class. I've browsed to texts that cover logarithmic equations and haven't found a single problem or rule say how to solve for 't'.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is no way to get 't' in terms of elementary functions, but you can solve it graphically or perhaps using another complex function.
 
Trancendental equation.
No closed form solution.
Turn it into a game.
Calculate ln(t)-t vs t in Excel.
Play with t.
Stop when you get to an answer accurate to 6 decimal places, ie. 2.000001.
Now you will have developed some feel for the iterative solution of a trancendental equation. You can then read more about Newton-Raphson, etc.
 
Exponentiate both sides to get:

te^{-t} = e^2

Now, multiply both sides by -1 to get -te^{-t} = -e^2. This is now of the form of the Lambert-W function, defined by

W(z)e^{W(z)} = z,

which determines t in terms of the lambert W function. This function is not an elementary function, but much is known about it. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W .
 

Mathematica 6 found a solution, however the numerical solution has a imaginary axis component.

ln(t) - t = 2

t = - ProductLog[-e^2]

ProductLog[z]
gives the principal solution for w in z=we^w.

The ProductLog[z] function is the Lambert-W function, however Mathematica 6 and 7 documentation does not mention this.

t = -1.13902 - 2.07318i
[/Color]
Reference:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lambert_W"
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/ProductLog.html"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K