Load combo's on footing subjected to large wind loads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fat Ryan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Load Wind
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on designing a footing for Radiation Portal Monitors (RPMs) that must withstand significant wind loads of 100-140 mph, alongside self-weight and environmental factors like ice and snow. The intern is updating a poorly structured spreadsheet that references outdated codes and standards, including a mix of ASD and LRFD methodologies. A key challenge lies in load factoring, particularly with different moment arms for wind and self-weight, complicating the load combination equations. The intern seeks advice on simplifying the load factoring process, as extensive data entry for various load scenarios is impractical given time constraints. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in load combinations while adhering to current standards.
Fat Ryan
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I am working on a spreadsheet for designing a small footing to support 1-4 Radiation Portal Monitors (RPMs). These are vehicle scanners weighing in around 2-2.5 kips a piece and roughly 7.5'Hx3'Wx1.5'D. they are arranged on the footing in a few different configurations. aside from the self weight, they are to be designed for wind loads around 100-140 mph. they also have input for ice and snow loads.

in my spreadsheet, its assumed that the RPM/footing connection is fixed and i do not need to supply a design for it. so in the spreadsheet i have checks for overturning, moment capacity, shear (1-way and 2-way), and sliding of the footing. also, i have a check for soil bearing capacity.

before i go any further...i am an intern, and this is the previous interns work that im... basically redoing completely lol

back on topic, i feel as though i pretty much have all the theory set right with a few assumptions here and there. I am still working on formatting (the previous interns spreadsheet was horrendous!), but i think its still easy enough to follow so far. one major issue with the spreadsheet though is that it references old code/standards. a lot of it was ASD with random interjections of LRFD and other methodologies (dont ask me why, it wasnt my doing). also, it references TIA standard...i don't see the previous intern's logic here. so I am trying to update the whole thing in conjunction with AASHTO spec for signs/supports (2009), AASHTO spec for highway bridges (if i have access to it), ASCE-7 08, and ACI 318-08.

my major issue comes in load factoring. it seems as though in AASHTO sign/support it says to factor the lateral wind load. however, the moment arm for the wind is different than that of the self weight and other loads. id think i should factor the loads at a common level (i.e. M for moment capacity, q for soil bearing, etc.). However, if i were to do that, it'd literally have thousands of iterations of the load combo equations to do...to account for wind in all directions, stress induced in +/- directions on both x & y axes. i just don't have time to do that kind of data entry, i have other spread sheets to work on.

am i missing something here? or what are my options, rather? thanks in advance.

(i tried attaching the spreadsheet, but it exceeds forum size limits. i can't access sites like megaupload.com here at work, so ill get it up when i get home)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
i got home waaaay later than i had planned last night, so i didnt get it up. but perhaps someone can help me with the load factoring without having the spreadsheet?
 
Hi all, i have some questions about the tesla turbine: is a tesla turbine more efficient than a steam engine or a stirling engine ? about the discs of the tesla turbine warping because of the high speed rotations; does running the engine on a lower speed solve that or will the discs warp anyway after time ? what is the difference in efficiency between the tesla turbine running at high speed and running it at a lower speed ( as fast as possible but low enough to not warp de discs) and: i...
Back
Top