According to Castigliano's theorem, the local compliance of an elastic structure, e.g. a cantilever, can be determined by integrating the products of stress intensity factor weight functions over the length of said structure. However, if I do that for a double cantilever beam using simple beam theory it yields an incorrect answer but I get the right one if I change the limits of the integration. Anyone have an explanation to that?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I've attached a hand written note demonstrating the details.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Local compliance with Castigliano's theorem

Loading...

Similar Threads - Local compliance Castigliano's | Date |
---|---|

Assumption of local thermodynamic equilibrium in a fluid | Apr 30, 2017 |

Aerospace Explanation of stiffness/compliance matrices | May 2, 2016 |

Local strain energy density for a plate subjected to in-plane linear load | Dec 5, 2011 |

Local bending stress calculation in long beams | Jul 21, 2011 |

Deflection of locally loaded beam | Mar 22, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**