Localization - Bijections between prime ideals of R and D^-1R

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the contraction bijection between prime ideals of the localization \( D^{-1}R \) and prime ideals \( P \) of \( R \) where \( P \cap D = \emptyset \). The contraction map \( c \) is defined as \( c(Q) = \Pi^{-1}(Q) \) for an ideal \( Q \) of \( D^{-1}R \). The participants clarify that if \( J \) is a prime ideal of \( D^{-1}R \), then its contraction \( {}^cJ \) does not intersect \( D \) and retains the prime property. The proof involves showing that \( ab \in {}^cJ \) leads to \( b \in {}^cJ \) if \( a \not\in {}^cJ \), establishing the bijection between the two sets.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of localization in ring theory
  • Familiarity with prime ideals and their properties
  • Knowledge of the contraction and extension of ideals
  • Basic grasp of the notation used in algebraic structures, particularly in Dummit and Foote
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of localization in ring theory, particularly in Dummit and Foote, Section 15.4
  • Explore the properties of prime ideals in commutative algebra
  • Investigate the relationship between contraction and extension of ideals
  • Learn about bijections in algebraic structures and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and students studying commutative algebra, particularly those focusing on localization and prime ideal theory.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Section 15.4: Localization and am currently working on Proposition 38, part 3 (contraction bijection) - see attachments.

I am hoping that someone can demonstrate a proof of the following propostion (without - as D&F do - referring to or relying on translating the result of Exercise 13, Section 7.4)

c maps prime ideals of $$ D^{-1}R $$ to prime ideals P of R where $$ P \cap D = \emptyset $$

Note: c is a contraction of ideals Q of $$ D^{-1}R $$ to R defined as folows:

$$ c: \ D^{-1}R \to R $$

where

$$ c(Q) = \Pi^{-1}(Q) $$ where Q is an ideal of $$ D^{-1}R $$

Hoping someone can help!

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By an earlier exercise, if $I \cap D \neq \emptyset$, we have ${}^eI = D^{-1}R$, which is not a prime ideal of $D^{-1}R$.

Since $J = {}^e({}^cJ)$ we see that if $J$ is a prime ideal of $D^{-1}R$, it must be the case that ${}^cJ$ does not intersect $D$ (if $D$ is an ideal, this is often expressed as: " ${}^cJ$ does not meet $D$").

D&F do not give a very good characterization of which elements of $R$ are actually in ${}^cJ$.

I claim that ${}^cJ = S = \{a \in R: a/1 \in J\}$.

Suppose $a \in S$. Then $a/1 \in J$

Hence $a \in \pi^{-1}(J) = {}^cJ$.

On the other hand suppose $a \in {}^cJ$. Then $a \in \pi^{-1}(r/d)$ for some $r/d \in J$. From:

$\pi(a)= a/1 = \pi(\pi^{-1}(r/d)) = r/d$, we see that $a/1 \in J$.

It remains to be seen that if $J$ is prime, ${}^cJ$ is prime.

So suppose we have $ab \in {}^cJ$, with $a \not\in {}^cJ$.

This means that $(ab)/1 = (a/1)(b/1) \in J$. Since $a \not\in {}^cJ$,

$a/1 \not\in J$, and since $J$ is prime, $b/1 \in J$, so $b \in {}^cJ$.

I leave it to you to show that $c$ is a bijection of the two sets.

(Hint: show any prime ideal of $D^{-1}R$ is an extension of a prime ideal $I$ in $R$ with $I \cap D = \emptyset$).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
976
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K