Logical Proofs Regarding Sets and Subsets

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the logical proofs related to sets and subsets, particularly the relationship between set A and set B. It emphasizes that if A is a subset of B, then every element of A must also be an element of B, which can be expressed using quantifiers. The conversation explores how to approach proving that the complement of B is a subset of the complement of A by starting with an element not in B and demonstrating it is also not in A. The participants highlight the importance of using definitions and logical reasoning to establish subset relationships. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the application of set theory principles in logical proofs.
enkrypt0r
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The following is all the information needed:

07rEA.png


Homework Equations



There are, of course, all the basic rules of logic and set identities to be considered.

The Attempt at a Solution



Not really sure how to attempt this one, to be honest. I know that (A ⊆ B) can be written with a quantifier and is equivalent to ∀x[xϵA ⇒ xϵB] but I'm really not sure how to apply this information properly.

Thanks, guys. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If A is a subset of B, then we know that any element of A is also an element of B.

Now, what if we take an element of U, that is not an element of B. What does that mean? Could such an element be an element of A?
 
In general you prove set X is a subset of set Y by starting "if x is a member of X" and then using the definitions of X and Y, and any other information you are given, to conclude "x is a member of Y".

To prove \overline{B}\subset\overline{A} start with "if x is a member of \overline{B} then x is not in B. Since, by hypothesis, A\subset B x is not in A. ...
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K