Looking for a Theorem of Continuous Functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of a function defined on a product space, specifically examining whether the function F(x,y) = (f(x), g(y)) is continuous if both f and g are continuous functions. Participants explore the implications of continuity in product spaces and related theorems, with a focus on theoretical aspects and examples.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if f:X→X' and g:Y→Y' are continuous, then F(x,y) is continuous, but seeks confirmation of this assertion.
  • Another participant agrees with the continuity of F and provides a reasoning involving the inverse images of open sets under f and g.
  • A participant states that a function from X to Y x Z is continuous if both component functions are continuous, suggesting that the original claim is a specific case of this broader theorem.
  • Further clarification is provided that the continuity holds even if F is defined differently, such as F(x,y) = (f'(x,y), g'(x,y)).
  • One participant discusses the relationship between products of spaces and maps, mentioning that this follows from the defining properties of products and functors.
  • A request for references on the topic of products of two maps indicates a desire for deeper understanding and resources.
  • Another participant reflects on learning continuity through metric spaces and proposes a method for understanding convergence in product spaces.
  • There is a question about whether the components of the product are viewed as functions from the product space or the original spaces, indicating some uncertainty in definitions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While some participants agree on the continuity of F given the continuity of f and g, there are nuances and clarifications that indicate a lack of complete consensus on the definitions and implications involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the definitions of functions in product spaces and the implications of continuity, highlighting potential limitations in their assumptions and definitions.

sammycaps
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Say I have a function F(x,y)=(f(x),g(y)), F:X×Y→X'×Y'. Is there a theorem that says if f:X→X' and g:Y→Y' are continuous then F(x,y) is continuous. I've proved it, or at least I think I have, but I'd like to know for sure whether or not I'm right.

I know that its not necessarily true that a function defined on a product space is continuous even if it is continuous in each variable separately. But it seems as though since the function I defined above does not interact x and y, there may be some different rules.

Also, if anyone knows for sure that this is not true, that would be useful information as well.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right F is continuous.

Suppose U',V' are open in X',Y'. Let U and V be their respective inverse images under f and g. The inverse image of U'xV' by your map F is UxV, which is open in XxY. Then use the fact that all open sets in X'xY' are unions of sets of the form U'xV'.
 
A function X-->Y x Z, F(x) = (f(x), g(x)) is continuous iff both f:X-->Y and g:X-->Z are continuous.

Your statement is a particular case of this. Also, it would still be true if you had F(x,y)=(f(x,y),g(x,y)).
 
quasar987 said:
A function X-->Y x Z, F(x) = (f(x), g(x)) is continuous iff both f:X-->Y and g:X-->Z are continuous.

Your statement is a particular case of this. Also, it would still be true if you had F(x,y)=(f(x,y),g(x,y)).

Ah I actually was looking at this theorem but I stupidly did not see this. I guess in my case where I define f on X and g on Y, I would write F(x,y)=(f'(x,y),g'(x,y)) where f'(x,y)=f(x)and g'(x,y)=g(x) so then g' and f' are both continuous and defined on X×Y, right?
 
as quasar says this follows immediately from what is essentially the defining property of a product. It is also one aspect of the statement that products are functors. i.e. when learning to define a product of two spaces one should also learn to define the product of two maps. i.e. products are functors from the collection (category) of pairs of spaces (X,Y) and pairs of maps (f,g), to the collection (category) of single spaces XxY, and single maps fxg. Your map is fxg.

so the full construction takes a pair of spaces (X,Y) to a space XxY, and a pair of continuous maps (f,g) to a continuous map fxg.
 
Can you give me a reference for products of two maps? Wikipedia is weak on this point and google is proving relatively useless.
 
sammycaps said:
Ah I actually was looking at this theorem but I stupidly did not see this. I guess in my case where I define f on X and g on Y, I would write F(x,y)=(f'(x,y),g'(x,y)) where f'(x,y)=f(x)and g'(x,y)=g(x) so then g' and f' are both continuous and defined on X×Y, right?

Right.
 
you just defined it yourself.
 
When first learning about continuity I found it instructive to try the theorem first for metric spaces. In this case, I start with X and Y metric spaces and try to come up with a metric on the product space such that Cauchy sequences in the product converge if an only if their projections converge. Then check to see if this gives you the product topology - just to be sure, The more general idea that has been discussed in this thread then becomes obvious from this.
 
  • #10
mathwonk said:
you just defined it yourself.

Are the components of the product viewed as functions from the product space or from the original space (in the definition I gave I had F(x,y)=(f'(x,y),g'(x,y)) where f(x,y)=f(x) (and for g), but wikipedia just calls them functions from the original spaces)?
 
  • #11
lavinia said:
When first learning about continuity I found it instructive to try the theorem first for metric spaces. In this case, I start with X and Y metric spaces and try to come up with a metric on the product space such that Cauchy sequences in the product converge if an only if their projections converge. Then check to see if this gives you the product topology - just to be sure, The more general idea that has been discussed in this thread then becomes obvious from this.

Ok, thanks very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K