Looking for an explanation of a simple Lipshitz condition

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding a simple Lipschitz condition in the context of a differential equation, specifically focusing on the equation \(\dot{y} = y^2\). Participants are exploring the implications of treating \(y\) as a function of \(t\) and the behavior of solutions to the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the treatment of \(y\) as a constant versus a function of \(t\). There are discussions on the correct approach to finding the antiderivative and the implications of the solution blowing up at certain points. Some participants express a desire to understand how to prove the solution and what resources might help them in this regard.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the nature of the differential equation and the necessary steps to verify solutions. There is a mix of attempts to clarify misunderstandings and suggestions for further reading to strengthen foundational knowledge.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express a background in engineering, indicating a potential gap in mathematical concepts that were previously learned. This context may influence their approach to the problem and the types of resources they seek for clarification.

dynamicskillingme
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


gif.gif

Has solution
gif.gif

It then goes on to state the solution blows up at
gif.gif
, which I understand.

My issue is when I do the solution I get
gif.gif


(Working)
gif.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dynamicskillingme said:
[itex]\dot{y} = y^2[/itex]
[itex]y = yt + c[/itex] ; for [itex]t = 0[/itex]

You seem to be treating [itex]y[/itex] as if it were a constant instead of a function of [itex]t[/itex].
We can't assume [itex]\int y dt = (y)(t) = yt[/itex] because, in this problem the antiderivative needed is [itex]\int y(t) dt[/itex] where [itex]y(t)[/itex] is an unknown function.

For example, if [itex]y(t) = e^t[/itex] then [itex]\int y(t) dt = e^t + c \ne (y(t))(t)[/itex].
 
If you could humour me as an engineer having to take a maths course and is struggling to remember concepts taught along time ago, How could I prove their answer, or what should I read up on to be able to show this proof?
 
dynamicskillingme said:

Homework Statement


gif.gif

Has solution
gif.gif

It then goes on to state the solution blows up at
gif.gif
, which I understand.

My issue is when I do the solution I get
gif.gif


(Working)
gif.gif

Wrong: ##y## is a function of ##t## because, after all, you have ##\dot{y} = dy/dt## in your equation to start with! So, from ##dy/dt = y^2## you have
[tex]\frac{dy}{y^2} = dt \: \Longrightarrow -y^{-1} = t + c,[/tex]
or
[tex]\frac{1}{y} = -c-t \: \Longrightarrow y = \frac{-1}{t+c}[/tex]
Set ##c = -1/y_0## and see what you get.

Anyway, if all you want to do is to see why ##y = y(t) = y_0/(1-y_0 t)## is a solution, just plug it into your differential equation ##dy/dt = y^2## and see if it works.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme
dynamicskillingme said:
How could I prove their answer, or what should I read up on to be able to show this proof?

Does the problem simply want to you show that ## y(t) = \frac{y0}{1 - y0 t} ## is a solution ? You do that by substituting that function in for ## y ## in the differential equation. (Of course you also have to substitute the derivative of ## \frac{y0}{1 - y0 t}## in for ##\dot{y}## , which means remembering enough calculus to compute that derivative ).When you substitute a solution into a differential equation, the equation should become an identity - i.e. the two sides should be the same function when you simplify things.Solving differential equations when you aren't given a solution, often involves guessing it. If you have to find the solution by yourself, start by reviewing your knowledge of derivatives with emphasis on noting how derivatives of a function y can be expressed in terms of the original function y.

For example:

## \dot{y} = 5y## corresponds to the derivative of ## e^{5t} ## is ## 5 e^{5t} ##.

Using "## D ##" to denote the operation of taking a derivative, ## De^{kt} = k e^{kt} ##. So when you are asked to solve a differential equation ## \dot{y} = k y ## (where ## k ## is a constant) you should be able to guess the answer is an exponential function.Ray Vickson illustrated the technique of solving a "separable" differential equation. You can find videos on the web that explain that technique in detail.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K