A Looking for info on the Betatron nuclear trigger from the early 1950s

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter cormsby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nuclear
cormsby
Messages
18
Reaction score
17
A colleague (PhD Physics, no weapons experience) asked me (MA Physics, with DoD work experience) about the Betatron nuclear trigger in the early Fifties. I know it used a toroidal accelerator to produce an electron beam impacting a Beryllium target, but I don't remember (and cannot find) any further details. Any ideas/sources?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

I found these two:​

Excitation Function for the Photodisintegration of Beryllium​

R. Nathans and J. Halpern​

Phys. Rev. 92, 940 – Published 15 November 1953​

---------------------------------------------------

Detection of Fissioning Materials Using a Neutron Source Based on a Compact Betatron​



Atomic Energy volume 96, pages 127–132 (2004)Cite this article

Abstract​

The possibility of using a neutron source based on a 10 MeV compact betatron and 1 kg heavy water or 3.3 kg beryllium in the betratron bremsstrahlung beam is investigated. The 235U detection limit in a 358 mm in diameter and 782 mm high container with probability 0.997 in an experimental apparatus with one epithermal-neutron detector is 40 mg with exposure 10 min. Increasing the mass of the neutron target to 10 kg heavy water and the number of neutron counters to 25 could decrease the 235U detection limit to 3 mg. A neutron detector based on a compact betatron can be expected to give 235U detection sensitivity 10–8 g/g.
----------------------------------
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and cormsby
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Back
Top