Loop and central cosmo mingle (Cornish glimpses Gambini)

  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Loop
In summary, Neil Cornish, a prominent figure in conventional mainstream cosmology, is now collaborating with Rodolfo Gambini, a prominent researcher in loop quantum gravity, on the concept of time and its connection to the unresolved black hole information paradox and quantum mechanics. Cornish's use of physical clocks in the Conditional Probability Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is expected to provide new insights and potentially resolve certain puzzles. This collaboration also brings attention to the GPP papers and their contributions to our understanding of quantum mechanics.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
This item has connections with the definition of time, the unresolved black hole information paradox, the interpretation of quantum mechanics involving real physical clocks, loop quantum gravity, conventional mainstream cosmology. It's a small news item, in a way, perhaps just a straw in the wind---but interesting because of the many cross-field ties.

Neil Cornish is an important figure in conventional mainstream cosmology. He used to have a pet monkey*. He has co-authored a bunch with Princeton's David Spergel including some of the main WMAP reports. He's more than usually creative idea-wise, by mainstream cosmo standards, IMHO. We've discussed several of his papers here at PF. Like the "circles in the sky" one that derived a minimum size for presentday space, and constrained the topology. He does stuff that surprise you but turn out to be mathematically and observationally very solid. Edgey but not flakey. Just the sort of research you want to make a field go.

Now he is on to something that a prominent LQG guy, Rodolfo Gambini, has also been working on. This means that the 2005-2007 papers of Gambini, Pullin, and Porto are authomatically more visible. These show that if you drop the idea of a perfect classic clock (basic to conventional QM) and re-formulate QM just using realistic physical clocks**, then there is a gradual rate of natural information loss and certain puzzles are resolved.

One of the GPP authors has actually posted some on PF, and we have discussed the GPP papers some, in past years. Despite their intrinsic interest, they haven't gotten as much notice as they deserve. I can't guess why: perhaps partly because Gambini is based in Montevideo and possibly also because he belongs to the Loop research community.

Anyway now we have a sign of some research confluence. Cornish cites 3 of the GPP papers and offers a different way of proving a result similar to theirs. Quite possibly an improvement. Here's the paper:

http://arxiv.org/abs/0811.2814
Semi-classical limit and minimum decoherence in the Conditional Probability Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Vincent Corbin, Neil J. Cornish
8 pages
(Submitted on 17 Nov 2008)

"The Conditional Probability Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics replaces the abstract notion of time used in standard Quantum Mechanics by the time that can be read off from a physical clock. The use of physical clocks leads to apparent non-unitary and decoherence. Here we show that a close approximation to standard Quantum Mechanics can be recovered from conditional Quantum Mechanics for semi-classical clocks, and we use these clocks to compute the minimum decoherence predicted by the Conditional Probability Interpretation."

**very much as Carlo Rovelli does, actually. In his book Quantum Gravity (2004) and also in his FQXi contest essay on What is Time?
Intriguing to see these lines of thought come together.

*back in 2005, if you went to Cornish' webpage, he had a picture of himself with this rather large cinnamon-colored monkey sitting on his shoulder, both of them grinning at the camera.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2

Thank you for bringing this interesting development to our attention. I am always fascinated by the connections and collaborations between different fields of research. It is through these interactions that we are able to make significant progress and breakthroughs in our understanding of the universe.

The work of Neil Cornish and his colleagues in the field of cosmology has been highly influential and has contributed greatly to our current understanding of the universe. It is exciting to see that he is now exploring the concept of time and its connection to the unresolved black hole information paradox and quantum mechanics. The fact that he is collaborating with Rodolfo Gambini, a prominent researcher in loop quantum gravity, only adds to the significance of this development.

I am also familiar with the work of Rovelli and his approach to time in quantum mechanics. It will be interesting to see how Cornish's use of physical clocks in the Conditional Probability Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics compares to Rovelli's approach.

I agree that it is important for the GPP papers to receive more attention and recognition for their contributions to our understanding of quantum mechanics. I am glad to see that Cornish is citing their work and offering a new perspective on their results.

Overall, this is a promising development and I look forward to seeing how it progresses. Thank you again for sharing this news with us.
 
  • #3


I find this content to be very interesting and exciting. The idea of re-formulating quantum mechanics using realistic physical clocks is a novel approach that could potentially resolve some of the long-standing puzzles in the field, such as the black hole information paradox. The fact that this idea is being explored by both a prominent mainstream cosmologist and a prominent LQG researcher shows that there is potential for cross-field collaboration and progress.

I am particularly intrigued by the idea of using physical clocks to read time in quantum mechanics, as it adds a tangible and concrete element to a field that can often seem abstract and theoretical. The potential for this approach to lead to a more accurate understanding of time is also very exciting.

Furthermore, the fact that Cornish's work builds upon and possibly improves upon the work of Gambini, Pullin, and Porto is a testament to the strength and potential of the research being done in the Loop community. It is important for different perspectives and ideas to be explored in order to advance our understanding of complex phenomena, and it seems that this convergence of ideas from different fields is a step in the right direction.

Overall, I believe that this small news item has the potential to make a big impact in the fields of quantum mechanics, loop quantum gravity, and cosmology. I look forward to seeing how this research progresses and what new insights and connections may emerge from it.
 

1. What is Loop and central cosmo mingle (Cornish glimpses Gambini)?

Loop and central cosmo mingle (Cornish glimpses Gambini) is a theoretical framework in cosmology that combines two different approaches: loop quantum gravity and central cosmology. It aims to provide a better understanding of the origin and evolution of the universe.

2. How does Loop and central cosmo mingle differ from other cosmological models?

Loop and central cosmo mingle differs from other models in the way it combines two distinct theories and incorporates them into a single framework. It also provides a more detailed and unified description of the early universe compared to other models.

3. What are some key concepts in Loop and central cosmo mingle?

Some key concepts in Loop and central cosmo mingle include the use of loop quantum gravity to describe the quantum nature of spacetime, the introduction of a central cosmological constant, and the incorporation of higher-dimensional spacetime in the early universe.

4. What are some potential implications of Loop and central cosmo mingle?

Loop and central cosmo mingle could have significant implications for our understanding of the Big Bang and the origin of the universe. It could also provide insights into the nature of dark energy and dark matter, as well as potentially resolving some long-standing problems in cosmology.

5. How can Loop and central cosmo mingle be tested or validated?

One way to test and validate Loop and central cosmo mingle is through observational data from telescopes and experiments, which can be compared to the predictions and calculations of the model. Additionally, future advancements in technology and data collection may also help to further test and refine this theoretical framework.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
11
Replies
370
Views
9K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
43
Views
10K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
1
Views
428
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
24
Views
682
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top