Loop-String companionship at the 2008 Bad Honnef conference

  • Thread starter marcus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Conference
In summary, the conversation revolves around a conference on quantum gravity that brings together both string and non-string researchers. The absence of a "camp mentality" is noted, with many researchers moving away from strict string-focused research. The conference program includes talks from both camps, with a focus on black holes and asymptotic safety. European influence is also noted.
  • #1
marcus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
24,775
792
This is definitely a Social Science thread because it deals with the rapidly changing relations between the string and non-string quantum gravity research communities.
The changing picture admittedly stems from current theoretical physics developments, and it its apt to have repercussions on future research directions---so it is closely bound up with purely physics issues.

Can't really understand the social network changes without reference to the physics. But here all I need to do is REPORT without exploring underlying causes.

Look at this April 14-16 conference program:
http://quantumgravity.aei.mpg.de/program
The PDF slides for many of the talks are available for download.
I've bolded some of the talks that interested me to see listed.

Titles :

I. Adam: Superstring perturbation theory
A. Ashtekar: Loop quantum cosmology: a status report
R. Blumenhagen: The landscape of string vacua
B. de Wit: Supergravity and M theory
L. Freidel: Status of spin foam models
S. Giddings: Black Holes, high energy scattering, and locality
H. Hamber: Lattice quantum gravity
M. Henneaux: Cosmological billiards and hidden symmetries of gravity
C. Kiefer: Quantum Geometrodynamics: whence, whither?
D. Marolf: Black Holes, AdS, and CFTs
K. Meissner: Background independence: a particle physicist's view
M. Reuter: Asymptotically safe quantum gravity
K. Stelle: Finiteness (or not) of N=8 supergravity
T. Thiemann: Loop quantum gravity

Discussion/Summary: Ashtekar, Blau, Giddings, Reuter, Stelle

Basically what's happening here is that Hermann Nicolai who directs the quantum gravity and unification wing at Max Planck Potsdam set up a conference on approaches to quantum gravity. And as a matter of course, he brought together non-string QG people with string and former-string folks. No big deal. Nicolai just thought they would benefit by talking to each other :biggrin:

Giddings and Marolf are at Santa Barbara. Neither of them IIRC has been doing especially stringy research recently. Both of their research has tended to be on black holes lately, a good topic for quantum gravity. Marolf is an old collaborator of Ashtekar's.
So I would not classify Giddings and Marolf as belonging to a string CAMP, although they have in the past both participated in a lot of stringy research. That is the thing that I see most obviously in the Bad Honnef conference program. An absence of camp mentality.

Nicolai's own research has always been in string, but he makes is institute at Potsdam hospitable to several non-string QG efforts.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hamber, another of the speakers, is the regular co-author of Ruth Williams at Cambridge. Hamber and Williams do simplicial QG----closely allied to the triangulations approach of the Utrecht bunch: so-called CDT.

Kiefer is something of a QG generalist, I think. He writes comprehensive review articles and compiles books covering several QG approaches.

Martin Reuter is someone we have had several threads discussing at PF Beyond forum. He and Roberto Percacci and half a dozen others have developed the Asymptotic Safety approach to QG. It has had some remarkable successes recently and some of the results are in surprising agreement with CDT, concerning the structure and dimensionality of spacetime at microscopic scale.

We have company. I have to go. Maybe I'll have some time to continue this later today.

It is kind of a sea-change, and noticeably European in manner. Worth thinking about.
 
  • #3
So he is in a good position to bring people together like this. I think it is a great idea to have conferences that bring together researchers from different communities within a field. It allows for a more comprehensive and diverse exchange of ideas and perspectives. And in the case of quantum gravity, where there are still many unanswered questions, this kind of collaboration can lead to new breakthroughs and advancements in the field. It's also encouraging to see that there is a growing recognition of the importance of incorporating non-string approaches to quantum gravity research, as they may hold the key to solving some of the challenges faced by string theory. Overall, this conference seems like a positive step towards promoting a more inclusive and cooperative atmosphere within the quantum gravity community.
 

1. What is "Loop-String companionship" at the 2008 Bad Honnef conference?

"Loop-String companionship" was the theme of the 2008 Bad Honnef conference, which focused on the interactions and relationships between different theoretical approaches in the field of particle physics.

2. Who organized the 2008 Bad Honnef conference?

The conference was organized by the German Physical Society (DPG) and the German Research Foundation (DFG).

3. What were the main topics discussed at the conference?

The main topics of the conference included string theory, loop quantum gravity, and other theoretical approaches to understanding the fundamental nature of particles and their interactions.

4. Were there any notable speakers at the conference?

Yes, there were several notable speakers at the conference, including renowned physicists such as Ed Witten, Abhay Ashtekar, and Carlo Rovelli.

5. What were some key takeaways from the conference?

Some key takeaways from the conference were the importance of collaboration and communication between different theoretical approaches, the potential for new insights and breakthroughs in particle physics, and the need for continued research and development in this field.

Similar threads

  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
61
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
9
Views
3K
Back
Top