Lost in Math - Sabine Hossenfelder

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter BWV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lost
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the book "Lost in Math" by Sabine Hossenfelder, which critiques the reliance on naturalness and mathematical elegance in theoretical physics. Participants express concern that the field may stagnate, likening it to English literature, where trends overshadow substantive advancements. The conversation highlights the tension between mathematical faith and the necessity for diverse problem-solving approaches in physics, emphasizing that inappropriate application of mathematics can lead to misguided interpretations. Hossenfelder's work is noted for its interviews with prominent figures in the field, reinforcing its relevance.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of theoretical physics concepts
  • Familiarity with the philosophy of science
  • Knowledge of mathematical frameworks used in physics
  • Awareness of historical shifts in physics paradigms
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Lost in Math" by Sabine Hossenfelder
  • Explore the philosophy of science regarding mathematical modeling
  • Investigate the historical context of quantum mechanics and its evolution
  • Analyze case studies of mathematical misapplications in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, philosophers of science, and students interested in the intersection of mathematics and theoretical physics will benefit from this discussion.

BWV
Messages
1,638
Reaction score
1,992
Opinions on the book? Enjoying it, but I am an non-scientist sympathetic to the notion that we may have reached the practical end of theoretical physics. I wonder what happens to the field as we reach the point where no working theoretical physicist has added anything that expanded our actual knowledge of nature. Does the discipline become like English lit, with an endless succession of fads good for nothing but generating papers to obtain tenure? Is quantum foundations like that?

Anyway the premise is that the requirement for naturalness and mathematical elegance has hindered the discipline
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
BWV said:
asthmatically elegance
I haven't read the book, but that doesn't sound right, @BWV
 
gmax137 said:
I haven't read the book, but that doesn't sound right, @BWV

Lol, horrible typo fixed
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
I have read it and liked it too. I was once an experimental physicist. However I have in the past been caught up in the search for underlying truths hidden in the complexity of the physical experiences as revealed by math. We have been tantalized by the elegance of mathematics and its ability to lead or guide us to new discoveries in our physical world. Physicists have faith in math as well they should. I do not think math lies but sometime it may babble or we may inappropriately apply it or interpret it and try hard to make sense of it. I guess math can be seductive and perhaps addictive leading us to loose sight of reality. You can have so much faith that you refuse to see the futility of the endeavor. We should encourage different approaches to solving problems but that is risky because it is not mainstream and the community does not share your vision or reward you for trying. So new people just jump into the milieu. Some math is just not appropriate for certain problems.

It's not like we haven't seen something like this before with the description of the atom using classical mechanics. Then Schrödinger/Dirac came along with new math approaches and voile problem solved.

Sabine didn't write the book in a vacuum having interview many recognized leaders in the field.

OK, I'm through rambling.

Have you seen this PF thread?
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/sabine-hossenfelder-and-beauty-in-physics.951354/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BWV
gleem said:
I do not think math lies but sometime it may babble
Funny and well said. :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
23K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
9K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
672
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K