Haelfix
Science Advisor
- 1,956
- 233
atyy said:But isn't the claim for string theory to reproduce GR more than that, since that only reproduces the vacuum Einstein equations. Matter minimally coupled to gravity comes from the string excitations, which are perturbative, so is it still true that the whole Lagrangian of GR pops out if one discusses non-vacuum GR?
"it seems that any acceptable quantum theory of gravity, whatever its ultimate formulation, is likely to reduce to a perturbative string theory in the appropriate limit."
Whether you get any matter at all is going to depend on the nature of the Stringy geometry and details of the moduli. Of course once you are far enough away from the Planck scale you can treat all the matter as an effective field theory and it will act like a stress energy term sourcing the Einstein equations.
As far as Lee's quote. Well, no one knows if String theory is correct or not, but of course whatever final theory of gravity is the truth, it will have to at the very least explain and subsume all the perturbative results from semiclassical gravity in the correct regime. That was my point earlier. We know a few things about perturbation series and gravity, and this does constrain our options.