Magnetic field in plane of ring, outside (verify please?)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field generated by a current-carrying ring in the xy-plane, specifically at a point on the y-axis outside the ring. The participant utilized Biot-Savart's law, represented as dB = (μ₀/4π) * (I dl × r̂) / r², to derive the magnetic field expression. The integral required for the calculation was complex, prompting the use of Maple for evaluation, which yielded a logarithmic result. The participant questioned the necessity of simplifying the ring to a square for easier calculations, highlighting the challenges posed by the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Biot-Savart's law and its application in electromagnetism.
  • Familiarity with integral calculus, particularly in evaluating complex integrals.
  • Knowledge of vector calculus, including cross products and unit vectors.
  • Proficiency in using Maple software for symbolic computation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the magnetic field using Biot-Savart's law for different geometries, including circular and square loops.
  • Learn advanced techniques for evaluating integrals in electromagnetism, focusing on logarithmic and trigonometric integrals.
  • Explore the application of numerical methods in Maple for solving complex integrals in physics.
  • Investigate the physical implications of magnetic fields generated by various current configurations, including their symmetry properties.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics and engineering, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as educators looking to clarify concepts related to magnetic fields and integral calculus.

Nick89
Messages
553
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I was hoping someone can verify this for me.

In uni today we had to calculate the magnetic field of a ring of current, lying in the xy-plane. First we had to calculate it on the z-axis (perpendicular to the ring) which was easy.
Then we had to calculate it on the y-axis (in the plane of the ring, outside of the ring). Because this was apparently too hard however, we had to 'simplify' the ring into a square, which made the calculation almost childlishly easy...

I was wondering now why they thought it was so hard... I tried to calculate it with an actual ring and the only difficulty I had was to calculate the integral, which was pretty ugly when calculated with Maple...

If someone can verify my calculation for me please that would be great.



Consider the following diagram, a loop (blue) with radius R lying in the xy-plane with a current I traveling in the direction of the vector dl.
2wdtwua.jpg


I want to calculate the magnetic field on the point P lying on the x-axis, a distance x from the origin, using Biot-Savart's law:
d \vec{B} = \frac{ \mu_0 }{4 \pi} \frac{I d\vec{l} \times \hat{r}}{r^2} where \hat{r} is the direction of \vec{r}.

Since r is dependend on \theta, I have to find a way to link them.

What I did was:
a = R \sin\theta \text{ , } b = R \cos\theta
r^2 = b^2 + (x-a)^2 = (R \cos\theta)^2 + (x - R\sin\theta)^2

Finally, (the part where I'm not entirly sure), I figured dl = R d\theta for a small angle d\theta.

This finally yields (the direction is obvious):
B = \frac{ \mu_0 I}{4 \pi} \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{ R d\theta }{(R \cos\theta)^2 + (x - R\sin\theta)^2}


For the integral, I didn't even try to do it manually but had Maple do it. The answer was:
\int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{ R d\theta }{(R \cos\theta)^2 + (x - R\sin\theta)^2}=-2\,iR \left( \ln \left( {\frac {i \left( {x}^{2}+{R}^{2} \right) }{-<br /> {x}^{2}+{R}^{2}}} \right) -\ln \left( {\frac {-i \left( {x}^{2}+{R}^{<br /> 2} \right) }{-{x}^{2}+{R}^{2}}} \right) \right) \left( -{x}^{2}+{R}^<br /> {2} \right) ^{-1}
(Yikes...)


Am I right on this? If so, I can't understand why we had to imagine the ring as a square (apart from the horrible integral)... It made the calculation completely different (upper and lower portion of the square cancel, remaining two lines are simply two lines, add up the fields...)
And we get horrible integrals all the time, the question just states that we don't have to calculate it then...

So yeah, thanks if anyone can verify or tell me where I went wrong!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to include the sine of the angle between r and dl in the cross product.
 
You're right, they're not always perpendicular, completely forgot about that!

So how could I find the angle?
 
Use either trig or cartesian coords.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
918
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K