Magnetic Field Surrounding a Straight Conductor

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of the sine function in the context of the magnetic field surrounding a straight conductor. Participants clarify the relationship between the angles in the cross product ##\vec{ds} \times \hat r## and the angle ##\theta## depicted in a diagram. The connection is established through the definition of the cross product, leading to the equation involving sine functions. The clarification helps participants grasp the geometric relationships involved in the problem. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of understanding angles in vector calculations related to magnetic fields.
member 731016
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Please see below
For this problem,
1673658720024.png

Part of the solution is,
1673658743775.png

1673658803501.png

However, would someone please tell me where they got the sine function circled in red from?

Many thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 1673658629770.png
    1673658629770.png
    8.2 KB · Views: 122
  • 1673658699232.png
    1673658699232.png
    35.2 KB · Views: 111
Physics news on Phys.org
Callumnc1 said:
However, would someone please tell me where they got the sine function circled in red from?
You're working with the cross product ##\vec{ds} \times \hat r##. How is the angle between ##\vec{ds}## and ##\hat r## related to the angle ##\theta## shown in diagram ##a##?
 
  • Like
Likes member 731016
TSny said:
You're working with the cross product ##\vec{ds} \times \hat r##. How is the angle between ##\vec{ds}## and ##\hat r## related to the angle ##\theta## shown in diagram ##a##?
Thank you @TSny ! I see how they got theta now. :) If we call the angle between ds and r hat as theta 2, then from the definition of the cross product:

dxsin(theta 2) = dxsin(pi/2 - theta) where I found theta 2 using angles in a triangle add up to 180 degrees.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top