Magnetostatics: Proof for θi, μ1, μ2, and μ3

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the proof of the angles θo and θi in a three-layer geometry with non-conducting media characterized by permeabilities μ1, μ2, and μ3. It is established that the angle θo is independent of the permeability μ2 and that θo equals θi when μ1 equals μ3. The key equations utilized include B1N = B2N and (1/μ1)B1T - (μ2)B2T = Js, which are essential for analyzing magnetic flux behavior across the interfaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetostatics principles
  • Familiarity with magnetic permeability (μ) concepts
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in electromagnetic theory
  • Proficiency in trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Snell's Law in magnetostatics
  • Explore the implications of non-conducting media on magnetic field lines
  • Investigate the behavior of magnetic fields at material interfaces
  • Learn about the applications of magnetic permeability in engineering contexts
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, electrical engineers, and researchers focusing on magnetostatics and electromagnetic theory, particularly those dealing with multi-layered material systems.

satchmo05
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
[PLAIN]http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/2757/96034584.png

Homework Statement



In the image above, magnetic flux enters the first interface of a three-layer geometry at an angle θi. If all three media are non-conducting and have permeabilities μ1, μ2, and μ3.
a.) show that the angle θo is independent of the value of μ2.
b.) show that θo = θi, when μ1 = μ3.

Homework Equations



1.) B1N = B2N
2.) (1/μ1)B1T - (μ2)B2T = Js

The Attempt at a Solution



Right off the bat, I know that since the media are non-conducting, that the surface currents at the boundaries are 0. Therefore, (1/μ1)B1T =(1/μ2)B2T. Using formula #2, I can plug in values for both regions 1 and 2, and I can do the same for regions 2 and 3, but then when comparing regions 1 and 3, that is where it gets tricky because following the same form as the standard regions, the θ in region 2 when comparing regions 2 and 3 would be equal to (90-θ). What I end up determining is θo = sin-1((μ11)(B1sinθi)/(B3tanθ). As you can see, this form for θo doesn't really help me much for part b.)

If anyone can give me a word of advice or a path to start on that will lead me to the right answer, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you much!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I solved the problem. Thanks for those who attempted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
9K