Major Evolution in Action

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tom.G
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of endosymbiosis, a significant evolutionary process where different types of cells merge to create new life forms, such as eukaryotes and plants. The conversation highlights recent research indicating the potential for endosymbiotic events to occur, which can lead to major evolutionary advancements. Key points include distinguishing endosymbiosis from simple symbiotic relationships, emphasizing the irreversible nature of one cell enveloping another and the genetic transfer from the internalized symbiont to the host. This genetic integration is crucial for establishing dependence between the two organisms, marking a clear evolutionary transition. The discussion references various scientific articles that explore these themes, underscoring the importance of endosymbiosis in the history of life on Earth.
Tom.G
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,661
Reaction score
4,504
TL;DR Summary
Two lifeforms merge in once-in-a-billion years evolutionary event
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Wow
Likes Nik_2213, BillTre, berkeman and 4 others
Biology news on Phys.org
This is an interesting article about the likelihood of endosymbioses (combining two different kinds of cells together to make a new evolutionary line) occurring.

These can be major events in evolution (like making eukaryotes or plants), but maybe not always.

Here is a link to a thread I made on a similar Nature article a few years ago:
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/new-eukaryotic-endosymbiont-found.1000450/
It involves a ciliate (eukaryote, normally with mitochondria) with a degraded form of mitochondria that acquired a bacterial symbiont that could make metabolic use of nitrate to generate ATP.

How might endosymbiosis be distinguished from just a symbiosis between cells exchanging nutrients adjacent to each other in their environment?
Here are some possibilities:
  • irreversible envelopment of one by the other. The internalized symbiont could be dependent on its host cell for a variety of reasons. If visualized as cell lineages (like a phylogenetic tree) the lineages of the internalized symbiont would be forever limited to being in the lineage of the host organism. Most likely the host would be dependent on the internalized symbiont in some way.
  • gene transfer (usually from the internalized symbiont genome to the host genome. This would provide a clear basis for the dependance of the internalized symbiont on the host.
 
Reply
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Klystron, pinball1970, Tom.G and 2 others

Thread 'Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD)'

https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
View full post »
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'

Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'

The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
View full post »

Thread 'Warning of new opiod drug (nitazene) on the streets: Question re strength...'

Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
View full post »

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top