A Majorana representation of higher spin states

fsh26
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
A discussion of the derivation of Majorana representation formulas for spins greater than 1/2 is proposed.
In the article by E. Majorana "Oriented atoms in a variable magnetic field", in particular, it's considered (and solved) the problem of describing a state with spin J using 2J points on the Bloch sphere.
That is, if
7e3c241c2dec821bd6c6fbd314fe476282.png
the general state of the spin system
679f58de747bff72cec9c3723ad74da282.png
, (1)
then, according to the article, those 2J points in on the Bloch sphere are described by the following complex numbers (
e5c0c55191274dbb2a4499ab5c5b817582.png
):

f49785bcd1e605a2f26f9c281d2d39d882.png
. (2)

Here
27e556cf3caa0673ac49a8f0de3c73ca82.png
- is the angle between the unit vector and the Z axis,
417a5301693b60807fa658e5ef9f953582.png
- is the angle between the projection of the given vector (on the XY plane) with the X axis (Bloch spheres),
b636c2bc2a36b39ce1fcd00d3608149a82.png
- are the roots of the polynomial

ecc40d0fc72539bcc35ea278c12e1e1f82.png
, (3)

where
a308d6d5ecec0821da53a116de4bf88082.png
. (4)

In the case of J=1/2, is very simple

82a5799a084a1412b6b7fb05a7a6a78b82.png
(5)

Here
46c2cd4b737ca51bb5e74a8cb0927f8b82.png
(
40e4299124d6568b9e826047114364f882.png
) can be considered as the probability of finding the end of the unit vector at the lower (upper) pole of the Bloch sphere, and
e5c0c55191274dbb2a4499ab5c5b817582.png
- is a point of the complex plane that is drawn through the center given sphere (stereographic projection of the end of the unit vector from the south pole onto the given plane).

But, for the cases J>1/2, I encountered difficulties in following the idea of deriving (3) and (4). Of course, there are several papers where this representation of Majorana is used, but so far I have not found such a work where the derivation of formulas is discussed in detail. I will be grateful if you advise literature or sources that can help to clearly understand the derivation of formulas (3) and (4).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By googling I've found this paper. Maybe it's of help:

https://www.reed.edu/physics/facult...ssays/Angular Momentum, Spin/D2. Majorana.pdf

This presentation of the irreps of the SU(2) is pretty out of use, but it can be found in some math books, like

V. I. Smirnov, A course of higher mathematics, vol. III part 1, Pergamon press (1964)

Usually we derive the representation theory of the rotation group SO(3) and its covering group SU(2) using the commutation relations of the angular-momentum components by diagonalizing simultaneously ##\hat{\vec{J}}^2## and ##\hat{J}_z##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top