Making a 2D Problem into a 1D Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter chessguy103
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    1d 2d
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around converting a 2D pressure problem involving two bolted plates into a 1D beam problem. Participants explore how to estimate the maximum distance between bolts based on the pressure applied to the plates and the resulting distributed load.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand how to convert pressure (w in psi) into a distributed load (q in lb/in) for a 1D analysis.
  • Another participant suggests calculating the total force on the plate by multiplying the exposed area by the pressure, then dividing by the number of bolts to find the force per bolt.
  • Clarification is provided that w represents the pressure on the plate and q is the distributed load, with a focus on determining the distance between bolts based on prescribed deflection.
  • There is a suggestion to consider the deformation characteristics of a bolted plate versus a beam supported by hinges, noting that the deformation behavior is different.
  • A later reply proposes an approach of removing bolts from consideration to simplify the analysis, treating the remaining bolts as solid supports rather than hinges, while also mentioning the importance of safety factors.
  • One participant references a design book for further guidance on proper bolt design, emphasizing the need to account for various factors like preload and tensile stress area.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on how to approach the conversion from a 2D to a 1D problem, with no consensus on the best method or the implications of the assumptions made in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of w and q, as well as the implications of treating the problem as a 1D beam versus a 2D plate. The discussion also highlights the need for safety considerations in the design process.

chessguy103
Messages
13
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
How can I take a 2D pressure problem and then it into a 1D beam problem?
Hi,

Forgive me for the crowded drawing, but please reference the attached screenshot. Let’s say I have 2 plates bolted together by some bolts (red), and on the inside is a pressure w pushing the top plate up, in psi (lb/in^2). In order to get an estimate for the maximum distance between bolts, I want to take the circled part and treat it as a 1D problem.

My question is, how do I take that w, and convert it into q in lb/in?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • 86C5C921-DD87-49BB-B10B-E46037D4E242.jpeg
    86C5C921-DD87-49BB-B10B-E46037D4E242.jpeg
    39.5 KB · Views: 140
Engineering news on Phys.org
It is rather unclear just what "W" and "Q" are, could you give their definition?

For a simplified approach, take the area in square inches that is exposed to pressure and multiply by the pressure.
Total_Force (on plate) = Area(sq.in.) x Pressure (psi)

To find the force on each bolt, divide Total_Force by number_of_bolts.
force_per_bolt = (Total_Force) / (number_of_bolts)

Then you have to decide if the bolts you want to use are strong enough to hold the thing together. (don't forget a safety factor! You don't want it to take someones arm off if it fails.)

Also decide if the plates are stiff enough so they don't deform like a balloon under pressure; and strong enough that they don't tear through at the bolt heads.

For more details, we need one of the Mechanical Engineers to chime in.

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and chessguy103
W is the pressure on the inside surface of the plate in psi, and q is the distributed load (lb/in) when looking at the problem from a 1D point of view, with 2 of the bolts acting as simple supports. The exact values don’t really matter. But let’s say I wanted to prescribe a certain deflection of that beam, and need to solve for L, the distance between the supports (aka bolts). That’s my goal.

So in order to go from psi to lb/in, would I multiply w by the “thickness” of the 1D beam that I’m considering to get to q?

I’m not sure if I’m thinking about this correctly, but that’s what I’m trying to get to.
 
An uniformly loaded plate deforms in
chessguy103 said:
Summary: How can I take a 2D pressure problem and then it into a 1D beam problem?

Hi,

Forgive me for the crowded drawing, but please reference the attached screenshot. Let’s say I have 2 plates bolted together by some bolts (red), and on the inside is a pressure w pushing the top plate up, in psi (lb/in^2). In order to get an estimate for the maximum distance between bolts, I want to take the circled part and treat it as a 1D problem.

My question is, how do I take that w, and convert it into q in lb/in?

Thanks
A plate bolted all around like that deforms very different from a beam supported by hinges.

Anyway, you could just imaginarily remove two rows of bolts on the longer side of the plate, and use the same value of pressure for uniformly distributed load and consider only the width of the plate supporting that load.

The remaining two rows of bolts will function more like two solid embedments at each end of the beam than hinges, but considering hinges would give you a higher value of safety factor.
 
Last edited:
Lnewqban said:
A plate bolted all around like that deforms very different from a beam supported by hinges.

Anyway, you could just imaginarily remove two rows of bolts on the longer side of the plate, and use the same value of pressure for uniformly distributed load and consider only the width of the plate supporting that load.

The remaining two rows of bolts will function more like two solid embedments at each end of the beam than hinges, but considering hinges would give you a higher value of safety factor.
If this is a real problem and not a purely academic one, you should consult Chapter 8 in Shigley's Design book (or a similar Machine Design book) to arrive a a proper bolt design that accounts for preload, tensile stress area, etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K