Making atoms out of their building blocks (p,n,e-)

  • Thread starter taylaron
  • Start date
  • #1
taylaron
Gold Member
391
1

Main Question or Discussion Point

Greetings Pfers
I am curious what breakthroughs need to be made for the completion of a device capable of forming an atom out of the basic subatomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons). Technology is advanced enough to where we have machines capable of generating these subatomic particles at will, and at very precise quantities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_gun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_source
Ionized hydrogen for a proton source
All of these can be generated using various exposures to ionizing radiation

Basically, we have the building blocks of an atom. So, what is keeping us from generating materials like Aluminum, Plutonium, or any other element?

While the energy required at the moment to generate the protons, neutrons and electrons most likely far outweighs the cost of traditional mining and refinement, please focus on the topic at hand.

Regards,
-Tay
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
UltrafastPED
Science Advisor
Gold Member
1,912
216
You need very high energy densities. For example, an ultrafast petawatt laser can (and has) transmuted elements.

This also occurs in the sun. But the energy density of the core of the earth is insufficient.
 
  • #3
mathman
Science Advisor
7,800
430
Greetings Pfers
I am curious what breakthroughs need to be made for the completion of a device capable of forming an atom out of the basic subatomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons). Technology is advanced enough to where we have machines capable of generating these subatomic particles at will, and at very precise quantities.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_gun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_source
Ionized hydrogen for a proton source
All of these can be generated using various exposures to ionizing radiation

Basically, we have the building blocks of an atom. So, what is keeping us from generating materials like Aluminum, Plutonium, or any other element?

While the energy required at the moment to generate the protons, neutrons and electrons most likely far outweighs the cost of traditional mining and refinement, please focus on the topic at hand.

Regards,
-Tay
Processes to create atomic nuclei are very expensive and produce extremely small quantities, suitable for lab. studies, but not for any commercial purpose.
 
  • #4
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,797
1,944
Basically, we have the building blocks of an atom. So, what is keeping us from generating materials like Aluminum, Plutonium, or any other element?

While the energy required at the moment to generate the protons, neutrons and electrons most likely far outweighs the cost of traditional mining and refinement, please focus on the topic at hand.

Regards,
-Tay
It's not clear why one would bother constructing atoms of elements from nucleons when they are available naturally and are mined economically. Economics is certainly a deciding factor in collecting an element. Neutron sources require pre-existing elements, regardless of the reaction involved.
 
  • #5
SteamKing
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
12,798
1,666
The problem is that you just can't take a batch of protons and neutrons and stick them together as if they were Legos. (Electrons are easy to add once you get the nucleus put together). The problem gets harder once the nuclei have more than a couple of protons, because adding any more protons requires that the incoming proton overcome the repulsion from the nucleus due to coulomb forces. It takes a lot of energy to do this, which is why transmutation requires the use of a particle accelerator or a nuclear reactor to induce radioactive transmutation by bombarding a target with neutrons (which are electrically neutral and not affected by coulomb forces from protons).
 
  • #6
taylaron
Gold Member
391
1
Thanks for your feedback. While it's apparently already been done, there is a lot of advancements that need to be made for it to become in any way practical. I hadn't considered the challenges associated with coulomb forces.

Regards.
 
  • #7
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
18,797
1,944
Thanks for your feedback. While it's apparently already been done, there is a lot of advancements that need to be made for it to become in any way practical. I hadn't considered the challenges associated with coulomb forces.

Regards.
As SteamKing indicated, the coulomb forces make it difficult for protons (or other nuclei) to approach a target nuclei, and as Z increases, the probability of 'absorption' decreases, while the probability of scatter increases. Much of the energy involved in the process would be lost to ionization of existing atoms and scattering (of the projectile protons or nuclei) and recoils of the target nuclei.

Coulomb forces [itex]\propto[/itex] Z2 for same species, or ZtZp, where Zt is the Z of the nuclear target and Zp is Z of the nuclear projectile.

There are no advancements that would make building nuclei from constituent nucleons 'practical'. One is stuck with the physics at hand, e.g., spallation reactions with existing elements. Stars on the other hand are practical with regard to nucleosynthesis, but they are 'out of reach', as is the sun. One can collect solar particles, but even that is expensive.

The earth's atmosphere does collect solar particles (solar wind) and cosmic radiation, and there are often spallation reactions that result in lighter nuclei, as well as the occasional formation of anti-protons.

http://www.technologyreview.com/view/424922/antiproton-radiation-belt-discovered-around-earth/

Examples of fusion
http://ph.qmul.ac.uk/sites/default/files/NPA19-Fusion.pdf
 

Related Threads on Making atoms out of their building blocks (p,n,e-)

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
572
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
840
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Top