Man Dies on Planet X: Preserving Earth's History?

  • Context: History 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vin300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of preserving Earth's history by sending materials to a lifeless planet, specifically Planet X or the Moon. Participants argue against the feasibility of this idea, citing the presence of bacteria in human bodies that would lead to decomposition. They emphasize that environmental factors such as temperature and atmospheric conditions would impact the preservation of materials. Ultimately, the consensus is that it is more practical and cost-effective to store historical artifacts on Earth rather than attempting to send them into space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic astronomy concepts
  • Knowledge of environmental factors affecting preservation
  • Familiarity with the implications of human decomposition
  • Awareness of current space exploration missions and technologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the preservation of biological materials in space environments
  • Explore the effects of temperature and atmosphere on material degradation
  • Study current methods of historical artifact preservation on Earth
  • Investigate the implications of sending biological samples into space
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy enthusiasts, preservationists, space exploration advocates, and anyone interested in the intersection of human history and extraterrestrial environments.

vin300
Messages
602
Reaction score
4
Confession: I have no background in astronomy. I'm not even sure whether this question is apt.

So a hypothetical situation goes like this. One of my friends is filthy rich and has one of those richman fantasies. By chance, a space science institution is willing to offer him a trip to planet X. He does whatever it takes, and finally reaches planet X.

Unfortunately, the module is no more in the best of its condition, there are lots of technical difficulties to initiate the return trip. The team gives up, soon they all die. Since there is no other living organism on the whole of the planet, as learned by earlier expeditions, would this team lay dead for eternity(nothing to decompose).

If that is so, is it not the best idea to preserve all of Earth's perishable history by just sending all relevant materials to a particular planet?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
vin300 said:
Since there is no other living organism on the whole of the planet, as learned by earlier expeditions, would this team lay dead for eternity(nothing to decompose).
This is not true, as we carry a vast variety of bacteria already in us. So we will decompose.
If that is so, is it not the best idea to preserve all of Earth's perishable history by just sending all relevant materials to a particular planet?
This implies to choose a planet without atmosphere to exclude erosion. Say the moon. However, regarding the many craters on the moon, how should we exclude impacts? Also changes in temperature may play a role, since many of our materials don't like to be overheated or undercooled. After all, it's simply too expensive, and why should we at all? The Voyagers and our radio broadcasts are already sent out to last forever.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
fresh_42 said:
This is not true, as we carry a vast variety of bacteria already in us. So we will decompose

Maybe not, it depend on the temperature and other environmental factors.

Still, OPs idea doesn't have a lot of merits. It's easier and cheaper to store things here. Maybe if some cataclysm was occurring we might want to shoot our DNA off into space hoping some kind Alien life would clone us or something.
 
Student100 said:
Maybe not, it depend on the temperature and other environmental factors.
Yes, if it is cold enough and the bodies cool down fast enough. But we don't inoculate our earthen bodies here with bacteria when we bury them, which means that there is nothing needed from outside, which was my point.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K