Manipulating Tensor Expressions to Derive the Poincare Algebra

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 4K views
stormyweathers
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

as this is a basic QFT question, I wasn't sure to put it in the relativity or quantum section. Since this question specifically is about manipulating tensor expressions, i figured here would be appropriate.


My question is about equating coefficients in tensor expressions, 2.4.10-11 in Weinberg's Quantum Theory of Fields (2005).

[itex]i[ 1/2 \omega_{\mu \nu} J^{\mu \nu} - \epsilon_{mu}P^{\mu}, J^{\rho \sigma} ] = \omega_{\mu}^{\rho} J^{\mu \sigma} - \omega_{\nu}^{\sigma} J^{\rho \nu} - \epsilon^{\rho}P^{\sigma}+ \epsilon^{\sigma}P^{\rho}[/itex]

[itex]i [ 1/2 \omega_{\mu \nu} J^{\mu \nu} - \epsilon_{\mu} P^{\mu} ,P^{\rho} ]=\omega_{\mu}^{\rho} P^{\mu}[/itex]

The task is to equate coefficients on the epsilon and omega terms to find the commutators of the poincare algebra. I'm a bit confused because, for instance, the omega term on the LHS of the first equation has dummy indices, but on the RHS has real indices. I'm not sure what manipulations i can do besides raising and lowering with the metric.
 
on Phys.org
In order to equate coefficients, for example with the (2.4.11) expression, you can expand the commutator and collect all the coefficients together on the left hand side so that it looks like:
[tex] -\frac{i}{2}\omega_{\mu\nu}\left[P^{\rho},J^{\mu\nu}\right] + i\epsilon_{\mu}\left[P^{\rho},P^{\mu}\right] = \omega_{\mu}^{\ \ \rho}P^{\mu}=\eta^{\rho\nu}\omega_{\mu\nu}P^{\mu}[/tex]
This already gives you the (2.4.14) result because there is no εμ coefficient on the right-hand side. With the ω coefficients you have to do a little work because they are not in a form you can get (2.4.13) directly with. Notice that the left-hand side is completely symmetric under μ↔ν (this is because ωμν and Jμν are both completely antisymmetric). This means the right-hand side must also be symmetric under this exchange. You know that you can write the symmetric part of a tensor Aij (the whole part here) as (Aij+Aji)/2. Therefore you can do this with the right-hand side and write:
[tex] -\frac{i}{2}\omega_{\mu\nu}\left[P^{\rho},J^{\mu\nu}\right] = \frac{1}{2}\left(\eta^{\rho\nu}\omega_{\mu\nu}P^{\mu} + \eta^{\rho\mu}\omega_{\nu\mu}P^{\nu}\right)[/tex]
That cancels out the factors of 1/2 and you can get the ωμν and ωνμ to look the same by using the antisymmetry of ωνμ=-ωμν. That leaves you with:
[tex] i\omega_{\mu\nu}\left[P^{\rho},J^{\mu\nu}\right] = \omega_{\mu\nu}\left(\eta^{\rho\mu}P^{\nu} - \eta^{\rho\nu}P^{\mu}\right)[/tex]
which gives you what he has, only with different greek letters for the indices.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gliderpilot9