Hi there,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I have a question about an assignment I got from school.

They were initially 12 assignments, I've finished 10 so far but I still can't figure how my last 2 assignments work.

First there is the question;

Prove that W_{1}(δ) and U_{1}(δ) are pivotal quantities, where W_{1}(δ) = sum of ranks assigned to Y_{11}-δ,.....,Y_{1n}-δ and U_{1}(δ) = W_{1}(δ) - n(n+1)/2.

I really don't understand how to prove that. I can imagine that proving that W is a pivotal quantity, will automatically result in U being a pivotal quantity since W is independent from parameter δ (is that the right parameter?).

Second question is about randomized block design.

The given question/assignment was; prove that SS=SSE+SST+SSB where;

SSE=measures variability in populations

SST=measures variability due to differences in populations

SSB=measures variability between blocks (?)

SS= measures total variability in data

http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/2817/knipseli.jpg [Broken]

I decided that it would be a lot more convinient to prove SS-SST-SSB=SSE since their formula's aren't so complex as the one from SSE is

Nevertheless it doesn't add up... When I simplefy them all (and with some help of reverse engineering -> simplefy SSE as well) I eventually end up with [tex]\Sigma\Sigma[/tex](Y_{ij}Y_{i[tex]\bullet[/tex]}-Y_{ij}Y_{[tex]\bullet[/tex]j}which should be equal to 2... (the bullets are supposed to be before respectively behind the j and the i in subscript)

I worked it all out, if any of you would like to see scans/images of what I've written on paper to see what I've done, just ask. I think I've made a mistake in simplefying the initial errors before I all summed them up. Nevertheless, on request, I will post my complete 3-page (bad handwriting) simplification/solution so far...

Please help me out on this, I'm going to get beserk in a matter of minutes cause the first 10 assignments already took me about 3 days to finish, but these 2 already took me a day and I still can't get how to prove them both...

Kind regards,

Sander

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Mann-Whitney test pivotal quantity & randomized block design

Loading...

Similar Threads - Mann Whitney test | Date |
---|---|

Mann-Whitney U test | May 6, 2013 |

Mann Whitney U test - Clarification on numerical outputs in SPSS | Nov 23, 2011 |

Mann-whitney U test? math n00b? | Jun 25, 2011 |

Why shift the Mann Whitney distribution? | Mar 19, 2009 |

Mann-Whitney p = 1.0! | Mar 14, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**