MHB Man's Age Now: Find Out His Digit Sum Born Year

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The man was born in 1991, making him 20 years old in 2011, as the digit sum of his birth year equals his age. By 2015, he would be 24 years old. The discussion centers on the relationship between his age and the digit sum of his birth year. The calculation demonstrates a unique numerical coincidence. Therefore, as of 2015, he is 24 years old.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
A man found (at year 2011) his age at that time was all the digit sum of the year when he was born,
can you tell me ,how old is he now ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Albert said:
A man found (at year 2011) his age at that time was all the digit sum of the year when he was born,
can you tell me ,how old is he now ?
[sp]The man was born in the year 1991 so that in the year 2011 his age was 1 + 9 + 9 + 1 = 20 years ...[/sp]

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
the sum of digits cannot be > 28 as 3 digit number < 2011 largest sum of digits (1999) is 28
so the year is 19ab or 20cd ( digit positions)

take 19ab.
now 10 a+ b + 1+ 9 + a + b = 111
or 11a + 2b = 111 so a is odd
a = 9 , b = 1 giving 1991
a = 7 or below give b > 9 not possible

take 20cd
so 10c + d + 2 + c + d = 11
11c + 2 d = 9
c = 0 and d = fraction
so no solution
so only solution 1991 and age = 20
 
I mean how old is he now ?(year 2015)
 
Albert said:
I mean how old is he now ?(year 2015)

24 years now
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top