I Manuscript on elementary rigid-body dynamics

AI Thread Summary
An elementary introduction to rigid-body dynamics has been shared, focusing on force-free motion and the heavy symmetric top. The discussion highlights the importance of considering cases where p_ψ equals ±p_φ in relation to the heavy symmetric top. Additionally, it emphasizes the correct definition of Euler angles, particularly when θ is not congruent to 0 modulo π. The non-uniqueness of Euler angles for specific values of θ has also been addressed. This resource aims to clarify common questions in the field of rigid-body dynamics.
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
24,488
Reaction score
15,057
In view of questions occurring from time to time in this forum, I've written an elementary introduction to rigid-body dynamics (mostly about the force-free and the heavy symmetric top). I hope, it's of some use:

https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~hees/pf-faq/spinning-top.pdf
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes weirdoguy, ergospherical, wrobel and 3 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Nice text. As for section "The heavy symmetric top" what about to consider the cases ##p_\psi=\pm p_\varphi##.
Perhaps it would also be good to stress that the Euler angles are correctly defined when ##\theta\ne 0\pmod{\pi}##
 
That's an interesting case, I guess. I'll have a look at it. I've put a sentence concerning the non-uniqueness of the Euler angles for ##\vartheta \in \{0,\pi\}##.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top