Many-Body Quantum Field Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the prerequisites for studying many-body quantum field theory, exploring the definitions and implications of "many-body" and "quantum field theory." It touches on various fields such as solid state physics, nuclear physics, statistical mechanics, and quantum chemistry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the background needed for many-body quantum field theory varies depending on the specific interpretations of "many-body" and "quantum field theory."
  • One participant argues that "many-body" and "quantum field theory" are redundant, as quantum field theory is inherently a many-body theory, while noting that many-body quantum mechanics can exist without field theory.
  • Another participant elaborates that many-body theories can be either interacting or non-interacting, with implications for how these theories are treated in different areas of physics.
  • It is mentioned that in certain fields, "many-body treatment" typically refers to interacting systems, while other areas may focus on effective non-interacting systems for interpretative ease.
  • There is a recognition that even free particle many-body theory can be complex, and that large parts of quantum field theory engage with these complexities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the redundancy of the terms "many-body" and "quantum field theory," and there is no consensus on the specific background required for studying the subject.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the ambiguity in definitions and the varying interpretations across different fields of physics, which may affect the understanding of many-body quantum field theory.

dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
What kind of background do I need to study many-body quantum field theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This depends on what you understand under "many-body" and under "quantum field theory". Could be anything from solid state or nuclear physics, over statistical mechanics, to quantum chemistry. Oh, and some quantum field people might also be doing that.
 
As I understand it, "many-body" and "quantum field theory" are redundant, in the sense that quantum field theory is already inherently a many-body theory. (It's not quite true the other way around--you can do many-body quantum mechanics without field theory.)
 
stevendaryl said:
As I understand it, "many-body" and "quantum field theory" are redundant, in the sense that quantum field theory is already inherently a many-body theory. (It's not quite true the other way around--you can do many-body quantum mechanics without field theory.)

Oh... right. That is is even another vector of confusion. Many-body theories can still be interacting (primarily dealing with particles interacting with each other via some two- or three, or more-particle forces) and non-interacting (primarily dealing with free particles, possibly interacting via symmetries (Fermionic/bosinic) and maybe a common one-body external potential).

In some areas of physics, "many-body treatment" would suggest the former, and all the areas I noted (except for maybe for QFT) are more concerned with interacting systems and ways of turning interacting systems (for which the Hamiltonian is known) into effective non-interacting systems (which are easier to interpret... e.g., Fermi liquids, Orbitals, shell models of nuclei). However, even for free particles many-body theory can be highly non-trivial, so large parts of QFT are highly concerned with those, although this kind of research would not be considered "many-body treatment" in quantum chemistry, for example.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K