Many-Worlds, Deriving the Born Rule?

  • #61
bhobba said:
You misunderstand. No interpretation is wrong since none can be proven or disproven by experiment. Until that is the case all are equally valid. The choice of one over the other is purely based on its appeal to you.
I agree completely, and this is a good place to close the discussion. Everyone has had a chance to plug their favorite interpretation, and there is no way to objectively do anything else.
 

Similar threads

I Why do we experience the Born Rule in Many Worlds?
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
I Carroll's Derivation of the Born Rule in MWI with Unequal Amplitudes
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
I Is Many Worlds Interpretation Compatible with ER=EPR?
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
I What is the current status of Many Worlds?
  • · Replies 174 ·
6
Replies
174
Views
13K
I Can the Many Worlds interpretation state the Born Rule as a postulate?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
A In what sense does MWI fail to predict the Born Rule?
  • · Replies 321 ·
11
Replies
321
Views
20K
I Steven Weinberg on the interpretation of quantum mechanics
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
8K
A Born's rule for the QED electron violates causality
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
I David Deutsch's Many Worlds Interpretation and the Double Slit Experiment
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
I What is the true nature of worlds in the Many-Worlds Interpretation?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K