Undergrad Mass Dimension of Fields (Momentum space)

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The mass dimension of a scalar field ##\phi## is established as ##\frac{d-2}{2}## in d-dimensional space-time. The discussion explores the mass dimension of the field in momentum space, ##\phi(p)##, particularly in the context of the two-point correlation function. It is noted that the Dirac delta function contributes a mass dimension of ##-d##, while the fractional component contributes ##-2##. Consequently, the overall mass dimension of ##\phi(p)## is determined to be ##\frac{-d-2}{2}##. This conclusion is reached through the Fourier transform and the action expressed in momentum variables.
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hi all,
We know from requiring the action be invariant that the mass-dimension of a scalar field ##\phi## is ##\frac{d-2}{2}## where ##d## is the space-time dimension. But what is the mass-dimension of ##\phi(p)##? I ask because free-theory 2-pt correlation function (in Euclidean space) is written as ##\langle\phi(p)\phi(q)\rangle = (2\pi)^{d}\delta^{d}(p+q)\frac{1}{p^{2}+m^{2}}##. The dirac delta seems to contribute a mass dimension ##-d## and then the fractional component contributes another mass-dimension of ##-2##? I'm not sure if this makes sense.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed, and therefore …

Another way of deriving it is to look at the action expressed in the momentum variables or just the definition of ##\phi(p)## in terms of ##\phi(x)##.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and vanhees71
Orodruin said:
Indeed, and therefore …

Another way of deriving it is to look at the action expressed in the momentum variables or just the definition of ##\phi(p)## in terms of ##\phi(x)##.
Ah, so the mass dimension is ##\frac{-d-2}{2}##. The fourier transform is indeed significantly simpler to see this.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
922
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K