Mass-dominated vs. radiation-dominated.

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter borvis
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the concepts of mass-dominated and radiation-dominated eras in the universe, exploring the implications of energy density related to mass and radiation. It includes theoretical aspects of cosmology and the behavior of energy densities over time.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the meaning of mass-dominated and radiation-dominated, suggesting that it relates to the energy density being dominated by mass or radiation.
  • Another participant confirms the initial inquiry, agreeing with the interpretation of energy density.
  • A participant explains the relationship between the expansion factor and energy densities, noting that radiation density decreases as \(\rho_{rad} \propto a^{-4}\) and matter density as \(\rho_{mat} \propto a^{-3}\), leading to an equivalence epoch where both densities are equal.
  • A later reply questions the relationship between the expansion factor and Hubble's law, suggesting that the expansion factor is proportional to the speed of objects moving apart, but another participant clarifies that Hubble's law is a local observation and that H(t) is defined differently in cosmology.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of mass-dominated and radiation-dominated eras, but there is some disagreement regarding the implications of Hubble's law and its relationship to the expansion factor.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the complexities of how Hubble's law interacts with cosmological definitions, and there may be assumptions about the understanding of cosmological terms that are not explicitly stated.

borvis
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have a simple question:
What does it mean that the universe is mass-dominated or radiation-dominated?
I can't find the answer anywhere on the internet. But i kind of think that it means that the energy-density of the universe is either dominated by the energy from mass or radiation. Is this correct? Thanks a lot.
 
Space news on Phys.org
Yes, that's correct.
 
Thanks!
 
If you call a the expansion factor, the energy density of the radiation goes as \rho_{rad}\propto a^{-4}, while for the matter you have \rho_{mat}\propto a^{-3}. If you plot logarithmically these quantities, you will see that at a certain a_{eq} the two densities will be equal: there it is the equivalence epoch. Before equivalence the radiation energy is greater that the matter energy, so you talk about "radiation-dominated era". For a>a_{eq}, you have the matter-dominated era.
 
And this means because of Hubbles law, v=Hr, you can say that a \propto r? Since the expansion factor is proportional to the speed that objects move from each other in space?
 
Not exactly, since in cosmology, H(t) is defined as (da/dt)/a (sort of like your v/r).

Hubble's law is really just a local observation of the universe expanding.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K