Mass Loss in Batteries: Debunking a Myth

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Eugbug
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Batteries Loss Mass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of mass loss in batteries during discharge, particularly addressing the claim that mass decreases due to the conversion of matter into energy as described by E=mc². Participants explore the implications of this equation in both chemical and nuclear reactions, as well as the practical significance of any mass loss observed.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that mass loss in batteries is due to vented gases from chemical reactions, arguing that E=mc² applies only to nuclear reactions.
  • Another participant counters that E=mc² applies to all reactions, using the example of water formation to illustrate that mass can be lost in chemical reactions as energy is released.
  • A similar point is reiterated by another participant, emphasizing that the mass change is minuscule and unmeasurable with standard chemistry balances.
  • One participant references the Hiroshima nuclear bomb as an example of significant mass conversion into energy.
  • A suggestion is made to explore binding energy and mass deficit, noting that heating a substance can increase its mass due to kinetic energy, which relates to E=mc².
  • Another participant mentions that while chemists often assume conservation of mass in chemical reactions, this assumption is not strictly true, as there is a very small loss of mass corresponding to the energy released, though it is negligible unless nuclear reactions are involved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of E=mc² to chemical reactions versus nuclear reactions. There is no consensus on the significance of mass loss in chemical reactions, with some arguing it is negligible while others suggest it is a relevant consideration.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the limitations of applying E=mc² in chemical contexts, noting that the mass changes are typically too small to measure practically. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of mass conservation principles in chemistry versus nuclear physics.

Eugbug
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I just want to confirm an error I have seen on another website about discharging of batteries.
The poster suggested that the mass of a battery decreases because matter is being converted into energy according to the equation E=mc2 as the battery discharges. They said that because c is so large, the weight loss would be imperceptible.My understanding is that any loss in weight is due to vented gases from the chemical reaction and E=mc2 only applies to nuclear reactions and not chemical reactions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope, E=MC^2 applies to all reactions. Consider a simply molecule such as water. Take the two hydrogen atoms and the oxygen atom and determine their mass before they combine. Now, combine them into a water molecule and measure the molecules mass. It will have LESS mass than the combined mass of the free hydrgoen and oxygen atoms. The missing mass was released in the energy that the reaction gives off.
 
Drakkith said:
Nope, E=MC^2 applies to all reactions. Consider a simply molecule such as water. Take the two hydrogen atoms and the oxygen atom and determine their mass before they combine. Now, combine them into a water molecule and measure the molecules mass. It will have LESS mass than the combined mass of the free hydrgoen and oxygen atoms. The missing mass was released in the energy that the reaction gives off.

The mass change is tiny and unmeasurable on a standard chemistry balance. You can use E=mc^2 and apply it to the energy released in the reaction and you'll come up with a miniscule change in mass.
 
The nuclear bomb that deverstated Hiroshima converted about 1 gm of matter into energy.
 
Check out BINDING ENERGY and MASS DEFICIT for some insights on the above posts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binding_energy#Mass_deficit


You'll note that it is "binding energy mass" is what changes rather than traditional "mass".

As an example, if you heat a substance it will have more "mass" and more gravitational effect
than before heating...The kinetic energy after heating of the constitutent particles increases and contributes to rest "mass" as noted above via E = mc2...

In a nuclear reaction, some actual constitutent particles are destroyed and converted to energy...radiation...again via E = mc2
 
Chemists usually assume conservation of mass from reactants they combine to the chemical products they form. It's a useful assumption in many applications where the energy release is below nuclear levels. It's not strictly true however. The heat energy that is released does correspond to a very small loss of mass, usually of an amount of no practical consequence, that is, if the reaction doesn't go nuclear.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
18K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
35K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K