Mass loss in common chemical reactions?

In summary: The sum of the masses of the protons and neutrons is greater than the sum of the masses of the electrons, so the atom has lost an electron.
  • #1
BarnRat
26
0
In any common chemical reaction that releases energy, say the reaction 2H2 + O2 = 2H2O, what mass is converted to energy via the E = MC2 equation? What sub-atomic particles are converted to energy during ordinary chemical reactions? I was taught us in HS and under-grad chemistry classes that mass is conserved in chemical reactions but I've read lately in Relativity Theory that it is mass-energy that is conserved. So, chemical reactions that release energy are converting a very small amount of mass to energy in the same, but opposite, manner that a substance warmed by sunlight is actually gaining mass.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
  • #2
BarnRat said:
In any common chemical reaction that releases energy, say the reaction 2H2 + O2 = 2H2O, what mass is converted to energy via the E = MC2 equation? What sub-atomic particles are converted to energy during ordinary chemical reactions?
Your second question first: None. Ordinary chemical reactions don't do that. Ordinary chemical reactions, even a highly reactive one, barely change the mass at all. As far as chemists are concerned, mass is conserved. Unless one is extremely careful and precise in measuring mass, the change in mass is immeasurably small in chemical reactions. (There is a change; it's just very small.)

Since subatomic particles are *NOT* destroyed, what does change?

The answer lies in binding energy. It takes a good deal of energy to strip all of the electrons from an atom. The amount of energy needed is the binding energy, and it is by this quantity (divided by the speed of light squared) that that the combined mass of a bare nucleus and the freed electrons exceeds the mass of the neutral atom. For example, the mass of a neutral hydrogen atom is slightly less than the sum of the masses of a proton and an electron.

The same concept applies to chemical compounds. That binding energy released when hydrogen and oxygen ignite to form water means that water is slightly (very slightly) less massive than the constituent oxygen and hydrogen molecules.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thank you for the great answer! Much appreciated.
 
  • #4
Have they changed the definition of binding energy?

I learned, many years ago that

Binding energy is the difference between the sum of the masses of neutrons and protons in the free state and the masses of the same number of neutrons and protons in a nucleus.

(Semat page 85)

Also the masses of the electrons are the same in an atom and free so cancel out.

Semat gives the folowing example: in atomic mass units

Lithium = 7.01822

4 Neutrons = 4 x 1.008987 = 4.03595
3 Protons = 3 x 1.008145 = 3.02444
total = 7.06039

The difference is the binding energy of 0.04217amu which can be equated to the binding energy by Einstein's equation.
 
  • #5


I can confirm that the mass-energy equivalence equation, E=mc^2, applies to all forms of energy, including chemical reactions. In the reaction 2H2 + O2 = 2H2O, a small amount of mass is indeed converted to energy, as predicted by Einstein's theory of relativity.

In ordinary chemical reactions, the sub-atomic particles that are converted to energy are primarily protons and neutrons, which make up the nucleus of atoms. These particles have a small mass, but when multiplied by the speed of light squared, it results in a significant amount of energy being released.

It is true that in traditional chemistry classes, we are taught that mass is conserved in chemical reactions. This is still true on a macroscopic level, where the mass of the reactants is equal to the mass of the products. However, on a sub-atomic level, a small amount of mass is converted to energy in accordance with Einstein's theory.

It is important to note that this conversion of mass to energy is not unique to chemical reactions. It occurs in all forms of energy production, such as nuclear reactions and even in the energy produced by the sun. This is a fundamental concept in physics and is crucial in understanding the behavior of matter and energy in the universe.

In summary, mass is indeed conserved in chemical reactions, but a small amount of mass is converted to energy according to the mass-energy equivalence equation. This is a concept that is supported by both traditional chemistry principles and the theory of relativity.
 

FAQ: Mass loss in common chemical reactions?

What is mass loss in a chemical reaction?

Mass loss in a chemical reaction refers to the decrease in the total mass of the reactants during the reaction. This can occur due to the formation of gaseous products or the release of energy in the form of heat or light.

How does mass loss affect the overall yield of a reaction?

Mass loss can have a significant impact on the overall yield of a reaction. In some cases, it can result in a decrease in yield as the products are lost in the form of gas. However, in other cases, mass loss can increase the yield by driving the reaction forward through Le Chatelier's principle.

What factors can contribute to mass loss in a chemical reaction?

There are several factors that can contribute to mass loss in a chemical reaction, including the formation of gaseous products, the release of energy, and the formation of precipitates. Other factors such as changes in temperature, pressure, and concentration can also affect mass loss.

How can we measure the amount of mass loss in a chemical reaction?

The amount of mass loss in a chemical reaction can be measured using a variety of techniques. One common method is to measure the change in mass of the reactants before and after the reaction. Other methods include gas collection and analysis, gravimetric analysis, and spectrophotometry.

Is mass loss always a desirable outcome in a chemical reaction?

No, mass loss is not always a desirable outcome in a chemical reaction. In some cases, it can lead to a decrease in the overall yield of the reaction. However, in other cases, mass loss can be necessary for the reaction to occur or can even increase the yield of the reaction. It ultimately depends on the specific reaction and its desired outcome.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
932
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top