Mass of orbiting body calculations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of an orbiting body, specifically in the context of celestial mechanics and orbital dynamics. Participants explore the application of Kepler's laws and the implications of mass ratios in orbital systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant attempts to calculate the mass of the Earth using the formula M = 4 * PI^2 * r^3 / (G * T^2) but confuses the mass of the Sun with that of the Earth.
  • Another participant points out that the formula used calculates the mass of the central object (the Sun) rather than the orbiting body (the Earth), emphasizing that the mass of the satellite does not affect the orbital parameters when the central body is significantly more massive.
  • A participant seeks clarification on what formula to use to calculate the mass of an orbiting body, acknowledging confusion after realizing their initial calculation was for the Sun.
  • It is noted that if the orbiting body is small compared to the body being orbited, the mass of the orbiting body cannot be determined from its orbital period and radius, as these parameters do not depend on the mass of the satellite.
  • Questions arise about the orbital characteristics of large planets like Jupiter and their potential for smaller orbits, with references to "Hot Jupiters" and the existence of smaller asteroids in larger orbits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the limitations of calculating the mass of an orbiting body based on its orbital parameters when the central body is much more massive. However, there is ongoing exploration of the implications of these principles, particularly regarding the characteristics of different celestial bodies.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the correct application of formulas and the implications of mass ratios in orbital mechanics. There is a lack of consensus on how to approach the calculation of mass for bodies without natural satellites.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in celestial mechanics, orbital dynamics, and the application of Kepler's laws in astrophysics.

gtsinc
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Ok, so I am tryting to calculate the mass of an orbiting body.

I am using M = 4 * PI^2 * r^3 / ( G * T^2 )

Lets use the Earth as an example.
However I am not getting what Nasa has for answers of 5.9 E24 kg.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/factsheet/earthfact.html


Using this calculator: http://www.ajdesigner.com/phpgravity/keplers_law_equation_mass.php

I am using a Radius of 149,600,000,000 meters
Ref: Semimajor axis (106 km) 149.60

Period of 365.25 or 365.25*24*24 = 31,557,600 seconds

G = 6.67E-11 N-m^2 / kg^2

That calculator gets 1.98 E+21 kg. Not even close to 5.9E+24
I get 1.98E+30 because I am using meters. But still not matching 5.9E+24

Can someone help with my math - not sure what is wrong.

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You've made at least two mistakes. First, this formula will give you the mass of the central object being orbited around, not of the orbiting body. In this case, you are calculating the mass of the Sun, not the Earth. If the central body is much more massive than the satellite (which is the case here), the orbital parameters are independent of the mass of the satellite. You should review how that formula is derived. Second, you must have plugged in the numbers wrong. If you do it right, it will correctly give you the mass of the Sun.
 
Ok, so I did have the mass of the sun calculated correctly as 1.98 E+30 but I was thinking of the orbiting body.

It has been years since I did this math.

What formula would I use?
 
What formula would you use for what? You used the right formula to calculate the mass of the Sun. You can't calculate the mass of the Earth from the parameters of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. If you want to calculate the mass of the Earth, you need to use something orbiting the Earth. Is that your question?
 
Sorry, yes, that was my question.
I wanted to calculate the weight of an orbiting body knowing its period and radius.

So if the body in question does not have a moon how else would it be calculated?
 
If the orbiting body is small compared to the body being orbited, there is no way to calculate the mass of the orbiting body from its period and radius. Look at the equations - the mass of the orbiting body cancels out. This means that objects of different mass follow the same orbit.
 
Now I understand - thank you.

So what would prevent a large planet like Jupiter from having an orbit as small as Mercury?
 
gtsinc said:
Now I understand - thank you.

So what would prevent a large planet like Jupiter from having an orbit as small as Mercury?
I'm guessing you haven't heard of Hot Jupiters?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_Jupiter
 
gtsinc said:
Now I understand - thank you.

So what would prevent a large planet like Jupiter from having an orbit as small as Mercury?

Nothing. As Bandersnatch points out, planets like this exist. Conversely, there are asteroids much smaller than Mercury in orbits like Jupiter's.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K