I Mass & Radiation 3D Distribution in the Universe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distribution of mass and radiation in the universe, specifically regarding inter-galactic space and galaxies. Participants express difficulty in finding comprehensive estimates for localized mass and radiation distribution, particularly concerning dark matter and black holes. One user recalls an article suggesting that black holes contain a significant portion of the universe's mass, which raises questions about terminology and search methods for relevant information. The conversation highlights the need for clearer definitions and reliable sources when researching cosmic composition. Overall, the quest for accurate data on mass and radiation distribution remains challenging.
Islam Hassan
Messages
237
Reaction score
5
TL;DR Summary
How much of the universe’s mass and radiation is estimated to be where
What percentage of the universe’s A) total mass —including dark matter— and B) radiation energy is estimated to reside in:
  • Inter-galactic space covering i) inter-galactic medium and ii) distinct inter-galactic astronomical objects; and
  • Galaxies covering iii) inter-stellar gas clouds, iv) stars, v) planets, vi) black holes + AGN’s and vii) other inter-stellar astronomical objects?

IH
 
Space news on Phys.org
Have you done any research on this prior to asking the question here? If so, what have you found?
 
  • Like
Likes PeterDonis
Yes I have, some time ago and I substantially found nothing. I was intrigued by an article I once read somewhere on the net that said that black holes contained the majority of the mass in the universe, which seemed odd. This question has been on my mind since then...recently I said to myself let's try PhysicsForums...

I tried with terms other than "mass/radiation distribution" too because replies to such searches yield composition in terms of ordinary matter, dark matter, dark energy. Localised matter distribution is not easy to find. The Wiki article on inter-galactic medium here does give a % (40%-50%) but for baryonic matter only. I have not come across any reference that provides a complete, comprehensive % estimate of localised mass/radiation distribution.

Perhaps it's a question of terminology; what should one use instead of mass/radiation 'distribution' as a search term?IH
 
Islam Hassan said:
I once read somewhere on the net that said that black holes contained the majority of the mass in the universe, which seemed odd.
Black holes contain most of of entropy.

Nevertheless, it has intrigued you to another question.
I suppose you have found articles such as the following
http://chartsbin.com/view/yuc#:~:text=Composition of the Universe , 1 more rows
 
Islam Hassan said:
an article I once read somewhere on the net

Can you give a reference? There are lots of random things "somewhere on the net".
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top