Mass suspended on a spring question

  • Thread starter Thread starter chriswev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mass-spring system where a 1.5 kg mass is suspended on a spring, causing it to oscillate. The original poster has provided initial calculations for parameters such as spring constant, angular frequency, and period, but is uncertain about how to express displacement as a function of time.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of displacement as a function of time, with some suggesting the use of cosine and sine functions. There is uncertainty about the phase angle and how to incorporate initial conditions into the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different formulations for displacement and are attempting to clarify the role of the phase angle. Some have provided guidance on how to derive the phase angle from given conditions, while others express confusion about the definitions and parameters involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a lack of clarity regarding whether displacement should be measured from the unstretched position of the spring or from the equilibrium position where the mass hangs at rest. Additionally, the original poster notes that course materials are not providing sufficient assistance.

chriswev
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1.5kg mass on spring streatched 3cm from natural length. oscillationg amplitude of 2.2cm. when t=0.01s, displacement x = 1.5 cm, I'm assuming gravity of 9.81 m/s

I've worked out k to be 490.5 N, w to be 18.08, T to be 0.348 secs and f to be 2.97Hz, which i think are all correct.

the question asks find displacement x as a function of time, I don't even know what this means, I don't even know what formula to use.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find displacement as a function of time, you find an expression describing the system with the displacement variable x and the time variable t, and then you re-arrange the expession to isolate the displacement variable on one side of the equation and an expression for time on the other side, i.e., find x(t).
 
Yeah that makes sense and was kinda the area I was thinking.
I've just found this:

x(t) = xm(the amplitude of motion) cos 2*pi*t/T

and think this might be the one to use, not sure how this will work out though
 
i've now got x(t) = 0.0632 does this seem right? and is it the final answer? I'm slightly worried as i have not used the x=1.5cm?
 
The general equation is:

x(t) = Acos(\omega{t} + \phi) + x_0

where x_0 is your equilbrium position... this is the position where the mass hangs from the spring without oscillating... ie: x0 = mg/k... a position of x = 0, corresponds to the spring's unstretched position.

you already know A and \omega... you need to get \phi

Edit: switched from y to x.
 
Last edited:
So the position i am at now is:- (I hope my earlier calculations arn't wrong)

x(t) = 0.022 cos(18.08 * 0.01 + (pi / 2)) + 0.015 ?

so my answer is:
x(t) = 0.037 ( does this even sound reasonable?)

My course notes and the books I have are of no help at all on this question. I don't even know how to work out the phase angle(phi), the best i can come up with is phi = pi/2 ?? which seems too simple

I'm now so confused and my head hurts. It doesn't help that my assessor is away for 2 weeks either.

Any extra help would be greatly recieved.
 
Last edited:
All your calculations for the first parts look right. The second part is asking for displacement as a function of time... that means t will be a variable in your expression...

x(t) = Acos(\omega{t} + \phi) + x_0

substituting your A, omega, and x0(x0 is actually given in the question as 3cm)

x(t) = 0.022cos(18.08{t} + \phi) + 0.03

once you get phi, just replace \phi with the number... and then you're done.

To solve for \phi use the fact that at t = 0.01s, x = 0.015m

So plug in t = 0.01, and x(t) = 0.015 and solve for \phi in radians.
 
so:

0.015 * 0.01 = 0.022cos(18.08t + phi) + 0.03

0.00015 / 0.022 = cos(18.08 * 0.01 + phi) + 0.03

0.0068 - 0.03 = cos(0.1808 + phi)

-0.0232 = cos0.1808 + cos phi

-0.0232 / cos1 = cos phi

-0.0232 = cos phi

cos -1(-0.0232) = phi

phi = 91.33 rad/s ? I'm sure I've got this totally wrong
 
By the x(t)... I didn't meant x multiplied by t... but just meant to emphasize that x is a function of t... you can just leave it as x if you want.

x = 0.022cos(18.08{t} + \phi) + 0.03

So plug in x = 0.015 and t = 0.01

0.015 = 0.022cos(18.08*0.01 + phi) + 0.03

0.015 -0.03 = 0.022cos(0.1808 + phi)

-0.015 = 0.022cos(0.1808 + phi)
-0.015/0.022 = cos(0.1808 + phi)

Now take the inverse cosine of both sides (use your calculator for the left side)... then solve for phi...
 
  • #10
I've just spoke to another instructor at the uni and he gave me the formula

X = A*sin(wt+phi)

I solved for phi and got 40.58 rad/s

Does this look right anyone?

Now I assume i put phi into the formula with A and w and leave X and t as letters?
 
  • #11
chriswev said:
I've just spoke to another instructor at the uni and he gave me the formula

X = A*sin(wt+phi)

I solved for phi and got 40.58 rad/s

Does this look right anyone?

Now I assume i put phi into the formula with A and w and leave X and t as letters?

You can use that formula as long as you define the x = 0 position as being when the mass is hanging motionless from the string... ie the equilibrium position...

It really depends on what they mean by displacement x... do they mean displacement from the unstretched spring position... or do they mean displacement from the 3cm position...

Do they give a picture by any chance? Anyway, phi should between 0 and 2pi = 6.28radians...

Reading the question again, yeah, they're probably asking for displacement from the position where the mass is hanging at rest... so

X = A*sin(wt+phi)

should be fine.

Can you show your calculations for how you got phi?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K