Mass: Uniting Quarks & Antimatter in Unexpected Ways

AI Thread Summary
Mass behaves differently than other quantum numbers when combining matter and antimatter, as it adds together rather than cancels out. The discussion clarifies that mass is not a quantum number and emphasizes that antiparticles possess positive mass, not negative. This is explained through the energy-momentum four-vector, which is always positive, and the principle that energy is inherently positive according to the equation E=mc². The original question is deemed unclear and inappropriate for the homework forum, as it stems from the poster's personal particle model inquiries. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in scientific questions and proper forum categorization.
talanum52
Messages
19
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Why does mass behave differently?
Relevant Equations
N/A
Mass behaves opposite that of other quantum numbers when combining matter (quarks) and antimatter. Why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is this really a homework question? In any case, the question is not clear.

What does "opposite" mean here? And mass is not a quantum number...
 
DrClaude said:
Is this really a homework question? In any case, the question is not clear.

What does "opposite" mean here? And mass is not a quantum number...
It adds together, rather than cancel.
 
talanum52 said:
It adds together, rather than cancel.
Anti-particles have positive mass, not negative mass.
 
jbriggs444 said:
Anti-particles have positive mass, not negative mass.
Why?
 
talanum52 said:
Why?
Because "mass" is the magnitude of the energy-momentum four-vector which is always positive.

In simpler but almost completely equivalent terms, because ##E=mc^2## (in a particle's rest frame) and energy is always positive.

And because the notion of particles that speed up when you apply a retarding force is not very sensible.

And because experiment shows that they have positive mass.
 
Last edited:
O.K. Thank you.
 
DrClaude said:
Is this really a homework question?
No, the OP has the recent days posted several of their questions in the HW forum which actually belongs in the technical forums (some threads got deleted because of OP is working on their own model of particles.)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top