Masses Moving Radially on a Rotating Disk

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the dynamics of masses moving radially on a rotating disk, specifically analyzing the behavior of a fifth object with a mass of 60 kg on a disk with an initial angular velocity of 2.094 rad/s and an inertia of 130 kgm². The maximum tangential speed calculated is 6.64 m/s, leading to a maximum angular velocity of 4.43 rad/s. When four objects are moved inward, the final angular velocity increases to 5.88 rad/s, exceeding the maximum and causing the fifth object to slide off the disk. The conversation highlights potential misunderstandings in the exercise's setup regarding static and kinetic friction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum conservation principles
  • Knowledge of static and kinetic friction coefficients
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and angular velocity calculations
  • Ability to apply Newton's laws in rotational motion contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of angular momentum conservation in rotating systems
  • Learn about the effects of friction on rotating bodies, focusing on static vs. kinetic friction
  • Explore advanced rotational dynamics, including the impact of sudden changes in mass distribution
  • Investigate real-world applications of rotational motion in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the dynamics of rotating systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those studying rotational motion and frictional forces.

hquang001
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
Four objects (each mass m=60 kg) are attached to a disk, which has a radius of r= 1.5 m and a moment of Inertia of I=130 kg m2. The objects can be moved by a motor from an outer position (ro=1.5 m) to an inner position (ri= 0.3 m). A fifth object (mass m5=60kg) is placed onto the disc. This object is not fixed to the disc like the other ones. But it has an unbelievable high static friction coefficient with the disc of μs=3.0. The kinetic friction coefficient has a value of μk=0.9. The disc starts to rotate at a modest 20 rev/min. All objects are at their outer positions. Then suddenly the motor moves the four objects to the inner positions. What is happening to the fifth object? Explain why and prove it by calculation. Keep in mind that g=9.81 m/s2
Relevant Equations
I1 w1 = I2 w2
F = ma
22.png

m = 60kg, ω0 = 2.094 rad/s, I of disk = 130 kgm^2 , outer position ro = 1.5m, inner position ri = 0.3m
∴Fifth object :
Ffriction = m.ac
μ.m.g = m. v^2 / R
=> vmax = √ 3. (1.5m) . (9.81 m/s^2 ) = 6.64 m/s => ωmax = 4.43 rad/s
so when the fifth object move with greater speed than vmax =6.64m/s , it will slide off

When four objects are moved to inner position, due to conservation of angular momentum, the final angular velocity of the disk will increase. and if it exceed the maximum angular speed, it slides off
Using conservation of angular momentum:I1ω1 = I2ω2
(130 + 5.m.r0^2). (2.094 rad/s ) = (130 + 4.m.ri^2 + m.x^2) .ω2

I got stuck here. I can't find final angular velocity and therefore can't find the position of the fifth object
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hquang001 said:
can't find the position of the fifth object
Assume it stays in place at ro and see if that leads to a problem or not.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hquang001
BvU said:
Assume it stays in place at ro and see if that leads to a problem or not.
Assume fifth object stay at ro :
=> w2 = 5.88 rad/s
it exceeds the maximum and will slide off but the position of the object is 1.5m, so is it wrong ?
 
So it will slide off.
And that answers the question of the exercise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hquang001
BvU said:
So it will slide off.
And that answers the question of the exercise.
Ohh i got it
Thank you
 
This is a strange question.
We are told the motor suddenly moves the four blocks to a smaller radius. That would generate a large acceleration of the disk, and the tangential acceleration surely would defeat the static friction anyway.
That in itself would not jettison the mass; it would simply find itself a bit further round the disk. So whether it then stays on the disk depends on the kinetic friction, which we are given.
Seems to me that the question setter has made a mistake, not having intended that the new radial acceleration alone would be enough to overcome static friction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and hquang001
When I re-read the probem statement, the fifth object starting at the outer position has no chance to move further round the disk !

I don't think the exercise composer intended anything more complicated than ##\ m\omega^2/r_o > f_s\,N ##

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hquang001
BvU said:
When I re-read the probem statement, the fifth object starting at the outer position has no chance to move further round the disk !

I don't think the exercise composer intended anything more complicated than ##\ m\omega^2/r_o > f_s\,N ##

##\ ##
Just allow a small margin between the object and the very edge of the disk. A sudden increase in spin would mean that the initial trajectory of the object relative to the disk is tangential. Only after that slippage starts, robbing the object of most of its frictional force, will it slide radially.
The two suspicious facts are
  • The movement of the other blocks is described as sudden
  • We are given a much lower kinetic friction coefficient
Why do either of those if they are irrelevant?
 
Last edited:
I see,

Can I make a case that the slippage occurs instantaneously ?
So the block no longer contributes to the moment of inertia - meaning ##\omega## steps from 2.094 not to 5.883 but to 11.12 rad/s

Kinetic friction is enough to maintain circular trajectory up to ##\omega ## = 2.43 rad/s which takes about 0.04 s.

That would mean: even without margin the object would do about 5 degrees on the rim and then continue in a straight line ? I think this is one of those exercises that hasn't been thought through completely by the composer; average to good students have no problem but very good students run into time-wasting complications.

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K