Mastering Mathematical Proofs: Solving the Universe's Integers with a-3b and a+b

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if the expression a - 3b is even, then the expression a + b is also even. Participants explore various cases based on the parity of integers a and b, concluding that by manipulating the equation a - 3b = 2k, where k is an integer, one can derive a + b = (a - 3b) + 4b. This leads to the conclusion that since both a - 3b and 4b are even, their sum a + b must also be even. The key insight is recognizing that the sum of two even numbers is always even.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of even and odd integers
  • Familiarity with basic algebraic manipulation
  • Knowledge of mathematical proofs and logical reasoning
  • Ability to work with integer equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of even and odd integers in depth
  • Learn about algebraic manipulation techniques for proofs
  • Explore mathematical induction as a proof technique
  • Investigate the role of parity in number theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in enhancing their understanding of mathematical proofs and integer properties.

CollectiveRocker
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
We are given the following statement: The universe is all integers. If a-3b is even, then a+b is even. I began off with saying that 3 cases exist: a is odd and b is even, a is even and b is odd, both a and b are odd, and both a and b are even. After this point I got really confused and lost. Can someone please point me in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hint, if a number is even, then it can be written as 2k where k is an integer.

since they tell you that a - 3b is even, then that means

a - 3b = 2k

for some integer k.
 
Last edited:
think about the difference between those two expressions
 
I don't understand what you mean when you say a-3b=2k. How does that help you?
 
try to manipulate that equation, so you have a + b on one side, and on the other you have 2* some integer.



edit: I edited the above post, to try to make it more clear
 
Last edited:
I realize that I just sound really stupid right now; but it's been a while since I've really done any math per say. I don't think any way exists to end up with a+b on one side with 2* something on the other side. The problem exists because of the 3, no matter what happens, there is no way to separate the 3 from the b, and still end up with a+b. Is there?
 
start by trying to obtain a + b on the left side. Remeber, anything you do on the left side you also have to do on the right side.

you can do this by adding 4b to both sides, and simplifying :smile:
 
Last edited:
Why worry about a-3b=2k? Why not just remember that the sum of two even numbers is an even number?

Doug
 
Do you mean a+b = 2(k+2b)?
 
  • #10
Mathechyst said:
Why worry about a-3b=2k? Why not just remember that the sum of two even numbers is an even number?

Doug
where does it say that a and b are both even?
 
  • #11
CollectiveRocker said:
Do you mean a+b = 2(k+2b)?
yep... since k + 2b is an integer, then 2(k + 2b) is even, therefore, a + b is even. The trickiest part of this proof, is just knowing that if a number is even then it can be written as 2 * an integer.
 
  • #12
It doesn't. It just says that if a-3b is even, then a+b is even. Then we are supposed to prove that statement any way possible which makes logical sense.
 
  • #13
MathStudent said:
where does it say that a and b are both even?

It doesn't but (a-3b)+c is even if a-3b and c are both even.

Doug
 
  • #14
Thank you so much guys, for sticking with me.
 
  • #15
Mathechyst said:
Why worry about a-3b=2k? Why not just remember that the sum of two even numbers is an even number?

Doug

Yes. This is what I was thinking too:

a+b = (a-3b) + (4b)

Since a-3b is given as even, and since 4b is even... and since the sum of two even numbers is even we know that a+b is even.
 
  • #16
Mathechyst said:
It doesn't but (a-3b)+c is even if a-3b and c are both even.

Doug
I see what you mean ... doesn't seem like either way is faster, but its good to know both :smile: .


edit: Actually I take that back, your method is a little faster, in that you don't have any manipulating to do.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
664
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K