Master's of Math without a BS in Math?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poker-face
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Master's
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of pursuing a Master's in Mathematics without having completed a Bachelor's degree in Mathematics. Participants explore the prerequisites for the program at Rutgers Camden, the adequacy of the required courses, and the implications of entering the program with limited prior coursework in mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Ernie G questions whether it is possible to succeed in a Master's program in Mathematics without a Bachelor's degree, given that he has only completed Calculus 1 and 2 and is currently enrolled in Calculus 2.
  • Some participants inquire about the specific courses Ernie has taken and the structure of the Master's program, expressing skepticism about the adequacy of a background limited to calculus and linear algebra.
  • One participant notes that the elective courses listed in the program appear similar to undergraduate courses, suggesting they may not be sufficiently advanced for a Master's level.
  • Another participant expresses concern about the reputation of the school, questioning the appropriateness of offering what they perceive as low-level courses in a Master's program.
  • Despite concerns, some participants believe that the courses are manageable for someone with a foundational knowledge of calculus and linear algebra, suggesting that Ernie should proceed with his plans.
  • Ernie acknowledges the concerns about course difficulty and reputation but expresses confidence in the program due to Rutgers' national recognition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of skepticism and support regarding the adequacy of Ernie's preparation for the Master's program. There is no consensus on whether the program's courses are appropriately challenging for a Master's level, and opinions vary on the implications of the school's reputation.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not reached a definitive conclusion regarding the appropriateness of the program's course level for a Master's degree, and there are differing views on the implications of entering the program without a Bachelor's in Mathematics.

Poker-face
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi all. My question is- is it possible to do well in a Masters in Math Program even though I have not completed a BS in Math. Rutgers Camden has a Masters Program that I can get into as long as I have completed up to Calculus 3, and Linear Algebra. I am only in Calculus 2 now, but I was thinking about taking Calc 3 in the first Term This summer and Linear Algebra in the second term. So far Calc 1 and 2 have seemed pretty easy and I should have no problen getting an A in both courses. I am 32 years old so maturity is on my side. I am very disciplined and will work as hard as necessary to suceed. I am not naive and understand that will alone is not enough. My question is does anyone have an opinon if this is either a good idea or not. My other option would be to stay at the school I am at and complete my second bachelors of which would take me just as long as the Masters.

Thanks for any advice,

Ernie G
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What courses have you already taken?? And, what courses are you planning to take in your masters, or what courses do they provide??

I ask this because I've never heard of someone doing their masters with only knowledge about calculus and linear algebra... But maybe the masters your planning to take, has enough low-level courses...
 
micromass said:
What courses have you already taken?? And, what courses are you planning to take in your masters, or what courses do they provide??

I ask this because I've never heard of someone doing their masters with only knowledge about calculus and linear algebra... But maybe the masters your planning to take, has enough low-level courses...

By the time I enter I will have taken Calc 1,2,3 and Linear Algebra. Here is a copy of the program requirements...

The minimum requirement to complete the track is to take the 6 required courses and 4 elective courses.

Pure Mathematics Course List:

Required Courses:

56:645:503 Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable I (3)
56:645:505 Analysis I (3)
56:645:508 Mathematical Reasoning (3)
56:645:531 Geometry (3)
56:645:549-550 Linear Algebra and Applications I,II (3,3)


Elective Courses:

56:645:504 Theory of Functions of a Complex Variable II (3)
56:645:506 Analysis II (3)
56:645:530 Manifolds (3)
56:645:532 Differential Geometry (3)
56:645:540 Computational Number Theory and Cryptography (3)
56:645:545 Topology (3)
56:645:551-552 Abstract Algebra I,II (3,3)
56:645:570 Special Topics in Pure Mathematics (3)
56:645:575 Qualitative Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations (3)
56:645:698 Independent Study in Pure Mathematics (3)
56:645:700 Thesis in Pure Mathematics (3)
 
The Elective courses look like modules you'd take in a regular undergraduate degree.
 
I think this courses are doable for somebody with a knowledge of calculus and linear algebra. They look more like undergraduate courses than masters courses. But the courses may also be a bit more difficult than the corresponding undergraduate course.
Anyway, I don't think it will be hard for you to begin this master. So I'd say to go ahead.

I am a bit worried about the reputation of the school. I don't think it's normal to offer such a low-level courses in a masters degree...
 
micromass said:
I think this courses are doable for somebody with a knowledge of calculus and linear algebra. They look more like undergraduate courses than masters courses. But the courses may also be a bit more difficult than the corresponding undergraduate course.
Anyway, I don't think it will be hard for you to begin this master. So I'd say to go ahead.

I am a bit worried about the reputation of the school. I don't think it's normal to offer such a low-level courses in a masters degree...

Micromass,

Thanks for the advice. I agree it seems a little watered down, but I would have to think that it should hold some weight because Rutgers is Nationally Recognized school. I think I am going to go for it.

Ernie G
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
824
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K